• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中为孕妇和哺乳期母亲提供母乳喂养小组(BIG)政策的有效性:整群随机对照试验

Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Hoddinott Pat, Britten Jane, Prescott Gordon J, Tappin David, Ludbrook Anne, Godden David J

机构信息

Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Centre for Health Science, Inverness IV2 3JH.

出版信息

BMJ. 2009 Jan 30;338:a3026. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3026.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.a3026
PMID:19181729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2635594/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a policy to provide breastfeeding groups for pregnant and breastfeeding women.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised controlled trial with prospective mixed method embedded case studies to evaluate implementation processes.

SETTING

Primary care in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and babies registered with 14 of 66 eligible clusters of general practices (localities) in Scotland that routinely collect breastfeeding outcome data.

INTERVENTION

Localities set up new breastfeeding groups to provide population coverage; control localities did not change group activity.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks from routinely collected data for two pre-trial years and two trial years.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

any breast feeding at birth, 5-7 days, and 8-9 months; maternal satisfaction.

RESULTS

Between 1 February 2005 and 31 January 2007, 9747 birth records existed for intervention localities and 9111 for control localities. The number of breastfeeding groups increased from 10 to 27 in intervention localities, where 1310 women attended, and remained at 10 groups in control localities. No significant differences in breastfeeding outcomes were found. Any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks declined from 27% to 26% in intervention localities and increased from 29% to 30% in control localities (P=0.08, adjusted for pre-trial rate). Any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks increased from 38% to 39% in localities not participating in the trial. Women who attended breastfeeding groups were older (P<0.001) than women initiating breast feeding who did not attend and had higher income (P=0.02) than women in the control localities who attended postnatal groups. The locality cost was pound13 400 (euro14 410; $20 144) a year.

CONCLUSION

A policy for providing breastfeeding groups in relatively deprived areas of Scotland did not improve breastfeeding rates at 6-8 weeks. The costs of running groups would be similar to the costs of visiting women at home.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44857041.

摘要

目的

评估一项为孕妇和哺乳期妇女提供母乳喂养小组的政策的临床效果和成本效益。

设计

采用整群随机对照试验,并结合前瞻性混合方法嵌入案例研究来评估实施过程。

地点

苏格兰的初级医疗保健机构。

参与者

在苏格兰66个符合条件的全科医疗群组(地区)中的14个进行登记的孕妇、哺乳期母亲和婴儿,这些群组常规收集母乳喂养结果数据。

干预措施

各地区设立新的母乳喂养小组以实现人群覆盖;对照地区不改变小组活动。

主要结局

根据两个试验前年份和两个试验年份的常规收集数据,在6 - 8周时的任何母乳喂养情况。

次要结局

出生时、5 - 7天以及8 - 9个月时的任何母乳喂养情况;母亲满意度。

结果

在2005年2月1日至2007年1月31日期间,干预地区有9747份出生记录,对照地区有9111份。干预地区的母乳喂养小组数量从10个增加到27个,有1310名妇女参加,对照地区仍为10个小组。未发现母乳喂养结局有显著差异。干预地区6 - 8周时的任何母乳喂养率从27%降至26%,对照地区从29%升至30%(经试验前率调整后P = 0.08)。未参与试验的地区6 - 8周时的任何母乳喂养率从38%升至39%。参加母乳喂养小组的妇女比未参加的开始母乳喂养的妇女年龄更大(P < 0.001),且收入高于对照地区参加产后小组的妇女(P = 0.02)。每个地区每年的成本为13400英镑(14410欧元;20144美元)。

结论

在苏格兰相对贫困地区提供母乳喂养小组的政策并未提高6 - 8周时的母乳喂养率。开展小组活动的成本与上门探访妇女的成本相近。

试验注册号

当前受控试验ISRCTN44857041。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/9a423a6628c6/hodp579185.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/1fd4aaac097a/hodp579185.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/fbcf46c0535e/hodp579185.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/88eddef8c1b9/hodp579185.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/9a423a6628c6/hodp579185.f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/1fd4aaac097a/hodp579185.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/fbcf46c0535e/hodp579185.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/88eddef8c1b9/hodp579185.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40a0/4787074/9a423a6628c6/hodp579185.f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.在初级保健中为孕妇和哺乳期母亲提供母乳喂养小组(BIG)政策的有效性:整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2009 Jan 30;338:a3026. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3026.
2
Effectiveness of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention in rural Scotland.母乳喂养同伴辅导干预措施在苏格兰农村地区的效果
Birth. 2006 Mar;33(1):27-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00071.x.
3
Cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for mothers to improve breast feeding in areas with low breastfeeding rates: the NOSH study protocol.在母乳喂养率较低地区,针对母亲的经济激励措施以改善母乳喂养的整群随机对照试验:NOSH研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010158.
4
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of parenting intervention for mothers experiencing psychosocial stress: insights from the early closure of the Mellow Babies RCT.针对经历心理社会压力的母亲的育儿干预措施的临床效果及成本效益:来自“温柔宝贝”随机对照试验提前结束的启示
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec;12(17):1-115. doi: 10.3310/KCVL7125.
5
Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.产后访视日程安排。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 21;7(7):CD009326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009326.pub4.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Lay support for pregnant women with social risk: a randomised controlled trial.对有社会风险的孕妇的非专业支持:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 2;6(3):e009203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009203.
8
Effect of Financial Incentives on Breastfeeding: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对母乳喂养的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Feb 5;172(2):e174523. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4523.
9
Effects of psychosocial support during labour and childbirth on breastfeeding, medical interventions, and mothers' wellbeing in a Mexican public hospital: a randomised clinical trial.分娩期间心理社会支持对墨西哥一家公立医院母乳喂养、医疗干预及母亲幸福感的影响:一项随机临床试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Oct;105(10):1056-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09936.x.
10
Frenotomy with breastfeeding support versus breastfeeding support alone for infants with tongue-tie and breastfeeding difficulties: the FROSTTIE RCT.舌系带过紧并伴有母乳喂养困难的婴儿行 Frenotomy 联合母乳喂养支持与单纯母乳喂养支持的效果比较:FROSTTIE RCT
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Jul;27(11):1-73. doi: 10.3310/WBBW2302.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Participation in Pregnancy Courses and Breastfeeding Support Groups on Attitudes and Knowledge of Health Professionals about Breastfeeding.参与孕期课程和母乳喂养支持小组对卫生专业人员母乳喂养态度和知识的影响。
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;10(4):632. doi: 10.3390/children10040632.
2
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
3
The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of professional support interventions for breastfeeding.母乳喂养专业支持干预措施的系统评价
J Clin Nurs. 2008 May;17(9):1132-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02239.x.
2
Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both.针对分娩或为人父母,或两者的个人或团体产前教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD002869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2.
3
Support for breastfeeding mothers.对母乳喂养母亲的支持。
针对英国旨在促进母乳喂养的孕妇产前和产后教育及支持干预措施的成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5.
4
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架:差距分析、研讨会和咨询知情更新。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(57):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
5
Validation of the Arabic Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES-A) among Lebanese women.阿拉伯语产妇母乳喂养评估量表(MBFES-A)在黎巴嫩女性中的效度验证。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Aug 21;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00409-w.
6
Impact and Effectiveness of Group Strategies for Supporting Breastfeeding after Birth: A Systematic Review.支持产后母乳喂养的团体策略的影响和效果:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052550.
7
Adapting breastfeeding support in areas of socio-economic deprivation: a case study approach.适应社会经济贫困地区的母乳喂养支持:案例研究方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01393-7.
8
Counselling interventions to enable women to initiate and continue breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促进妇女开始并持续母乳喂养的咨询干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Breastfeed J. 2019 Oct 21;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0235-8. eCollection 2019.
9
Interventions for supporting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding among women who are overweight or obese.针对超重或肥胖女性的支持母乳喂养启动和持续进行的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):CD012099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012099.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of offering an area-level financial incentive on breast feeding: a within-cluster randomised controlled trial analysis.提供地区层面的母乳喂养经济激励措施的成本效益:一项基于群组的随机对照试验分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Feb;105(2):155-159. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316741. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub3.
4
Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions.描述复杂干预随机试验的图形方法。
BMJ. 2007 Jan 20;334(7585):127-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68.
5
Health professionals, implementation and outcomes: reflections on a complex intervention to improve breastfeeding rates in primary care.卫生专业人员、实施情况与成果:对一项旨在提高初级保健中母乳喂养率的复杂干预措施的思考
Fam Pract. 2007 Feb;24(1):84-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml061. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
6
Recruitment issues when primary care population clusters are used in randomised controlled clinical trials: climbing mountains or pushing boulders uphill?在随机对照临床试验中使用基层医疗人群集群时的招募问题:爬山还是推巨石上山?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 May;28(3):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
7
Are breastfeeding rates higher among mothers delivering in Baby Friendly accredited maternity units in the UK?在英国获得“爱婴医院”认证的产科单位分娩的母亲中,母乳喂养率更高吗?
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1178-86. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl155. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
8
One-to-one or group-based peer support for breastfeeding? Women's perceptions of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention.一对一或基于小组的母乳喂养同伴支持?女性对母乳喂养同伴指导干预的看法。
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):139-46. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00092.x.
9
Effectiveness of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention in rural Scotland.母乳喂养同伴辅导干预措施在苏格兰农村地区的效果
Birth. 2006 Mar;33(1):27-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00071.x.
10
Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.促进母乳喂养启动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD001688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub2.