Department of Gastroenterology, Coimbra University Hospital, Praceta Mota Pinto e Av Bissaya Barreto, Coimbra 3000-075, Portugal.
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jan;55(1):153-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0687-y. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
Clinical utility of prokinetics in capsule endoscopy (CE) is not clearly established. The objective of this prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was to determine if metoclopramide is useful in CE by increasing the rate of complete enteroscopy. Ninety-five patients referred for CE were randomized to no metoclopramide (group B, n = 48) or 10 mg metoclopramide (group A, n = 47). Complete enteroscopy was possible in 38 patients of group A (80.9%) and 37 of group B (77.1%) (P = 0.422) with two cases of gastric retention in group B (4.2%; P = 0.253). Median gastric transit time was 26 min (1-211) in group A and 28 min (4-200) in group B (P = 0.511). Mean small bowel transit time, calculated after excluding 20 patients with incomplete enteroscopy, was similar in both groups (221.2 +/- 89 min vs. 256 +/- 82.2 min; P = 0.083). There were also no differences in the total number of findings (group A 4.5 +/- 4.7; group B 4.7 +/- 3.7, P = 0.815). Administration of 10 mg metoclopramide orally 15 min before capsule ingestion did not significantly increase the rate of total enteroscopies and had no effect on transit times. It also did not modify CE diagnostic yield.
在胶囊内镜(CE)中,促动力药物的临床实用性尚未明确。本前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照试验的目的是确定甲氧氯普胺是否通过增加全肠道检查率而在 CE 中有用。95 例因 CE 而转诊的患者被随机分为不给予甲氧氯普胺(B 组,n = 48)或 10 mg 甲氧氯普胺(A 组,n = 47)。A 组中有 38 例(80.9%)和 B 组中有 37 例(77.1%)(P = 0.422)能够进行全肠道检查,B 组中有 2 例(4.2%)发生胃潴留(P = 0.253)。A 组的中位胃通过时间为 26 分钟(1-211),B 组为 28 分钟(4-200)(P = 0.511)。排除 20 例肠道检查不完全的患者后,计算出的平均小肠通过时间在两组之间相似(221.2 +/- 89 分钟 vs. 256 +/- 82.2 分钟;P = 0.083)。两组的总检出数也无差异(A 组 4.5 +/- 4.7;B 组 4.7 +/- 3.7,P = 0.815)。在胶囊摄入前 15 分钟口服 10 mg 甲氧氯普胺并未显著增加全肠道检查率,也未影响通过时间。它也没有改变 CE 的诊断收益。