Goligher Ewan, Ferguson Niall D
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Feb;15(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283220df2.
To describe the trends in the results of epidemiological studies of mechanical ventilation.
Changes in population demographics have increased the incidence of mechanical ventilation. Higher age and comorbidity rates portend poorer outcomes of mechanical ventilation. The most common indication for initiation of mechanical ventilation is acute respiratory failure, including postoperative respiratory failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome have a much higher mortality risk than the rest of this population. Changes over time in the selection of modes of ventilation, tidal volumes, positive end-expiratory pressure levels, weaning strategies, and tracheostomy timing appear to accord with data from randomized controlled trials in the literature. However, despite these changes, observational studies have not detected a statistically significant change in adjusted mortality over time.
The burden of critical illness will likely continue to increase in the future. Evidence from randomized trials appears to have affected the management of mechanical ventilation, but adherence to evidence-based practices may not be ideal.
描述机械通气流行病学研究结果的趋势。
人口统计学变化增加了机械通气的发生率。较高的年龄和合并症发生率预示着机械通气的预后较差。启动机械通气最常见的指征是急性呼吸衰竭,包括术后呼吸衰竭、肺炎、脓毒症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征。脓毒症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的死亡风险比该人群中的其他患者高得多。随着时间的推移,在通气模式、潮气量、呼气末正压水平、撤机策略和气管切开时机的选择上的变化似乎与文献中随机对照试验的数据一致。然而,尽管有这些变化,观察性研究并未发现调整后的死亡率随时间有统计学上的显著变化。
未来危重病的负担可能会继续增加。随机试验的证据似乎影响了机械通气的管理,但对循证实践的遵循可能并不理想。