• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传染病时代的伦理学:一种关系视角。

Ethics in a time of contagion: a relational perspective.

作者信息

Austin Wendy

机构信息

John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre and Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2008 Dec;40(4):10-24.

PMID:19186783
Abstract

In times of contagion, the key role of nurses brings fears, dangers, and unique demands. The ethics of such challenges need to be explored and understood. Using Callahan's framework for thinking ethically and Taylor's "worries" of modern life, the author elucidates some of the challenges and then argues that the current approach to pandemic ethics, with its reliance on moral reasoning, is insufficient to guide nurses' ethical actions. Relational ethics, which explicitly situates ethics within relationships and our commitment to one another, and which recognizes that context matters in ethical decision-making, is offered as a viable alternative for nurses in considering how to respond.

摘要

在传染病肆虐时期,护士的关键作用带来了恐惧、危险和独特的要求。此类挑战的伦理问题需要加以探讨和理解。作者运用卡拉汉的伦理思考框架以及泰勒对现代生活的“担忧”,阐明了其中一些挑战,进而认为当前应对大流行伦理的方法,因其依赖道德推理,不足以指导护士的伦理行为。关系伦理明确将伦理置于人际关系以及我们对彼此的承诺之中,并认识到情境在伦理决策中至关重要,它被作为护士在思考如何应对时的一种可行选择提了出来。

相似文献

1
Ethics in a time of contagion: a relational perspective.传染病时代的伦理学:一种关系视角。
Can J Nurs Res. 2008 Dec;40(4):10-24.
2
Nurses' obligations in a pandemic or disaster.护士在大流行或灾难中的义务。
Nurs N Z. 2007 Nov;13(10):27-31.
3
Professional values and norms for nurses in Belgium.比利时护士的职业价值观与规范
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Nov;10(6):654-65. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne654oa.
4
Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice.迈向适用于护理实践的强大美德伦理学。
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):110-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00268.x.
5
Relational and embodied knowing: nursing ethics within the interprofessional team.关系和具身认知:跨专业团队中的护理伦理。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Jan;18(1):20-30. doi: 10.1177/0969733010386165.
6
Ethical dilemmas and moral distress in oncology nursing practice.肿瘤护理实践中的伦理困境与道德困扰
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Dec;10(6):775-80. doi: 10.1188/06.CJON.775-780.
7
A pluralist view of nursing ethics.护理伦理学的多元主义观点。
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):157-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00272.x.
8
Am I still ethical? The socially-mediated process of nurses' moral identity.我是否仍合乎道德?护士道德身份的社会介导过程。
Nurs Ethics. 2002 Nov;9(6):623-35. doi: 10.1191/0969733002ne556oa.
9
Shared moral work of nurses and physicians.护士与医生的共同道德工作。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Jul;14(4):478-91. doi: 10.1177/0969733007077882.
10
Ethics in nursing education: learning to reflect on care practices.护理教育中的伦理学:学会反思护理实践。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Nov;14(6):758-66. doi: 10.1177/0969733007082116.

引用本文的文献

1
[Between care for others and self-care: intensive care nursing in times of the COVID-19 pandemic].[在照顾他人与自我照顾之间:新冠疫情期间的重症护理]
Ethik Med. 2021;33(1):51-70. doi: 10.1007/s00481-021-00606-5. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19.WICID 框架 1.0 版:指导针对 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施进行循证决策的标准和考虑因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003699.
3
Connecting With Adolescent Mothers: Perspectives of Hospital-Based Perinatal Nurses.
与青少年母亲建立联系:基于医院的围产期护士的观点。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2020 Jan 27;7:2333393619900891. doi: 10.1177/2333393619900891. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Ethical issues in the response to Ebola virus disease in US emergency departments: a position paper of the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Emergency Nurses Association and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.美国急诊科应对埃博拉病毒病中的伦理问题:美国急诊医师学会、急诊护士协会及学术急诊医学协会的立场文件
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):e5-e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.01.012.