Swanson Mark W, McGwin Gerald, Elliott Amanda F, Owsley Cynthia
Department of Optometry, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):486-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02144.x. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
To evaluate the association between the Minimum Data Set's (MDS) Vision Patterns section and near and distance visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in nursing home residents.
Cross-sectional study.
Seventeen nursing homes in the Birmingham, Alabama, area.
Three hundred seventy-one nursing home residents aged 55 and older with Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 13 or greater.
The MDS 2.0 assessment for vision from the date closest to acuity and contrast sensitivity assessment were obtained from the resident's medical record. Acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured using the ETDRS chart and Pelli-Robson chart, respectively.
The MDS rating of visual status was associated with distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. The MDS performed poorly in distinguishing residents with mild visual impairment from those with moderate visual impairment. For residents who were rated on the MDS as having adequate vision, 45.9% had distance acuity worse than 20/40 in the better eye, 72.8% had near acuity worse than 20/40 in the better eye, and 85.8% had contrast sensitivity less than 1.50.
The MDS 2.0 assessment for vision in nursing home residents is positively associated with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity but does not adequately distinguish between individuals with mild and moderate visual impairment and classifies many as having adequate vision who have visual impairment. The validity of the MDS 2.0 as a mechanism for triggering comprehensive eye care for nursing home residents is questionable.
评估最小数据集(MDS)的视力模式部分与疗养院居民的近视力、远视力及对比敏感度之间的关联。
横断面研究。
阿拉巴马州伯明翰地区的17家疗养院。
371名年龄在55岁及以上、简易精神状态检查表得分在13分及以上的疗养院居民。
从居民病历中获取最接近视力和对比敏感度评估日期的MDS 2.0视力评估。分别使用ETDRS视力表和贝利-罗伯逊对比敏感度检查表测量视力和对比敏感度。
MDS视力状况评级与远视力、近视力及对比敏感度相关。MDS在区分轻度视力损害居民和中度视力损害居民方面表现不佳。对于在MDS上被评定为视力正常的居民,45.9%的人较好眼的远视力差于20/40,72.8%的人较好眼的近视力差于20/40,85.8%的人对比敏感度低于1.50。
疗养院居民的MDS 2.0视力评估与视力及对比敏感度呈正相关,但不能充分区分轻度和中度视力损害个体,且将许多有视力损害的人归类为视力正常。MDS 2.0作为触发疗养院居民全面眼部护理机制的有效性值得怀疑。