Suppr超能文献

烧伤及术后瘢痕的客观评估以及主观瘢痕类型判断的准确性。

Objective evaluation of burn and post-surgical scars and the accuracy of subjective scar type judgment.

作者信息

Wang Zhi-yong, Zhang Jian, Lu Shu-liang

机构信息

Department of Burns, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Burns, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Dec 20;121(24):2517-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The true proliferation degree of burn and operation scars during their maturation was poorly defined. The objective of this study was to provide a quantitative evaluation of the proliferation degree of deep-partial thickness burn and surgical suture wound scars after wound healing and the accuracy of subjective judgment of scar types.

METHODS

A total of 423 patients in the burn group and 667 patients in the suture wound group were enrolled in this study. Objective scar measurement (by negative-positive moulage) was carried out at 3, 6 and 12 months after wound healing in 1090 patients from different regions in China. The Kruskal-Wallis H test and chi-square test were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The median degrees of scar proliferation were 0.03 cm at 3 months, 0.03 cm at 6 months and 0 cm at 12 months in the burn group and 0.05 cm, 0.04 cm and 0.04 cm respectively in the suture wound group. At 3 and 6 months post wound healing, there was no significant difference in scar proliferation between the groups (P > 0.01). After 1 year, burn scars displayed evidence of atrophy (P < 0.01). Although the degree of scar proliferation differed among the four scar types (P < 0.01), the ranges of scar height in the four scar types largely overlapped when judged in a subjective manner, especially in proliferation and superficial scars.

CONCLUSIONS

Scar atrophy occurs after one year in burns, but not in the surgical suture wound group. It is important to take anti-scar therapy for surgical wounds as well as burn wounds. The various scar types could not be judged precisely in a subjective manner.

摘要

背景

烧伤和手术瘢痕在成熟过程中的真正增殖程度尚不明确。本研究的目的是对深Ⅱ度烧伤和手术缝合伤口瘢痕愈合后的增殖程度进行定量评估,并评估瘢痕类型主观判断的准确性。

方法

本研究纳入了423例烧伤组患者和667例缝合伤口组患者。对来自中国不同地区的1090例患者在伤口愈合后3、6和12个月进行客观瘢痕测量(通过阴-阳模塑法)。统计分析采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验和卡方检验。

结果

烧伤组瘢痕增殖的中位数在3个月时为0.03 cm,6个月时为0.03 cm,12个月时为0 cm;缝合伤口组分别为0.05 cm、0.04 cm和0.04 cm。在伤口愈合后3个月和6个月时,两组之间的瘢痕增殖无显著差异(P>0.01)。1年后,烧伤瘢痕出现萎缩迹象(P<0.01)。虽然四种瘢痕类型的瘢痕增殖程度有所不同(P<0.01),但在主观判断时,四种瘢痕类型的瘢痕高度范围有很大重叠,尤其是在增殖性瘢痕和浅表性瘢痕中。

结论

烧伤后1年出现瘢痕萎缩,但手术缝合伤口组未出现。对手术伤口以及烧伤伤口进行抗瘢痕治疗很重要。各种瘢痕类型无法通过主观方式精确判断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验