Groene O, Lombarts M J M H, Klazinga N, Alonso J, Thompson A, Suñol R
Avedis Donabedian University Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i44-50. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029397.
There is growing recognition of patients' contributions to setting objectives for their own care, improving health outcomes and evaluating care.
To quantify the extent to which European hospitals have implemented strategies to promote a patient-centred approach, and to assess whether these strategies are associated with hospital characteristics and the development of the hospital's quality improvement system.
Cross-sectional survey of 351 European hospital managers and professionals.
Patients' rights, patient information and empowerment, patient involvement in quality management, learning from patients, and patient hotel services at the hospital and ward level were assessed. The hypothesis that the implementation of strategies to improve patient-centredness is associated with hospital characteristics, including maturity of the hospital's quality management system, was tested using binary logistic regression.
In general, hospitals reported high implementation of policies for patients' rights (85.5%) and informed consent (93%), whereas strategies to involve patients (71%) and learn from their experience (66%) were less frequently implemented. For 13 out of 18 hospital strategies, institutions with a more developed quality improvement system consistently reported better results (percentage differences within maturity classification ranged from 12.4% to 46.6%). The strength of association between implementation of patient-centredness strategies and the quality improvement system, however, seemed lower at the ward than at the hospital level. Some associations (OR 2.1 to 5.1) disappeared or were weaker after adjustment for potential confounding variables (OR 2.2 to 3.7).
Although quality improvement systems seem to be effective with regard to the implementation of selected patient-centredness strategies, they seem to be insufficient to ensure widespread implementation of patient-centredness throughout the organisation.
患者在设定自身护理目标、改善健康结果及评估护理方面所做的贡献日益受到认可。
量化欧洲医院实施促进以患者为中心方法的策略的程度,并评估这些策略是否与医院特征及医院质量改进系统的发展相关。
对351名欧洲医院管理人员和专业人员进行横断面调查。
评估了医院和病房层面的患者权利、患者信息与赋权、患者参与质量管理、从患者身上学习以及患者酒店服务。使用二元逻辑回归检验了改善以患者为中心的策略的实施与医院特征(包括医院质量管理系统的成熟度)相关的假设。
总体而言,医院报告称患者权利政策(85.5%)和知情同意(93%)的实施程度较高,而让患者参与(71%)和从患者经验中学习(66%)的策略实施频率较低。对于18项医院策略中的13项,质量改进系统更完善的机构始终报告有更好的结果(成熟度分类内的百分比差异在12.4%至46.6%之间)。然而,以患者为中心的策略实施与质量改进系统之间的关联强度在病房层面似乎低于医院层面。在对潜在混杂变量进行调整后,一些关联(比值比2.1至5.1)消失或变弱(比值比2.2至3.7)。
尽管质量改进系统似乎在实施选定的以患者为中心的策略方面有效,但它们似乎不足以确保在整个组织中广泛实施以患者为中心的理念。