• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[莱比锡心脏麻醉快速通道方案。有效、安全且经济]

[Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical].

作者信息

Häntschel D, Fassl J, Scholz M, Sommer M, Funkat A K, Wittmann M, Ender J

机构信息

Abteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie II, Herzzentrum, Universität Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2009 Apr;58(4):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1508-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-009-1508-1
PMID:19189062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In November 2005 a complex, multimodal anesthesia fast-track protocol (FTP) was introduced for elective cardiac surgery patients in the Cardiac Center of the University of Leipzig which included changing from an opioid regime to remifentanil and postoperative treatment in a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit. The goal was to speed up recovery times while maintaining safety and improving costs.

METHOD

A total of 421 patients who underwent the FTP and were treated in the special recovery room were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were compared with patients who had been treated by a standard protocol (SP) prior to instituting the FTP. Primary outcomes were time to extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and treatment costs.

RESULTS

The times to extubation were significantly shorter in the FTP group with 75 min (range 45-110 min) compared to 900 min (range 600-1140 min) in the SP group. Intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were also significantly shorter in the FTP group (p<0.01). The reduction of treatment costs of intensive care for FTP patients was 53.5% corresponding to savings of EUR 738 per patient in the FTP group compared with the SP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia including the central elements of switching opiate therapy to remifentanil and switching patient recovery to a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit, shortened therapy times, is safe and economically effective.

摘要

背景

2005年11月,莱比锡大学心脏中心为择期心脏手术患者引入了一种复杂的多模式麻醉快速康复方案(FTP),其中包括从阿片类药物方案改为瑞芬太尼,并在一个特殊的麻醉后恢复和护理单元进行术后治疗。目标是在保持安全性和控制成本的同时加快康复时间。

方法

对在特殊恢复室接受FTP治疗的421例患者进行回顾性分析。将这些患者与在实施FTP之前按照标准方案(SP)治疗的患者进行比较。主要结局指标为拔管时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和治疗费用。

结果

FTP组的拔管时间显著缩短,为75分钟(范围45 - 110分钟),而SP组为900分钟(范围600 - 1140分钟)。FTP组的重症监护病房住院时间和住院总时长也显著缩短(p<0.01)。与SP组相比,FTP组患者的重症监护治疗成本降低了53.5%,相当于每位患者节省738欧元。

结论

莱比锡心脏麻醉快速康复方案,包括将阿片类药物治疗改为瑞芬太尼以及将患者康复转移至特殊的麻醉后恢复和护理单元等核心要素,缩短了治疗时间,安全且具有经济效益。

相似文献

1
[Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical].[莱比锡心脏麻醉快速通道方案。有效、安全且经济]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Apr;58(4):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1508-1.
2
Fast-track anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of sevoflurane with total intravenous anesthesia.在接受门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中进行快速通道麻醉:七氟醚与全静脉麻醉的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
A comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia.芬太尼、舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用于快通道心脏麻醉的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2001 Oct;93(4):859-64. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00011.
4
The efficacy and resource utilization of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast-track coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled, multi-center trial.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼在快通道冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的疗效及资源利用情况:一项前瞻性随机、双盲对照、多中心试验。
Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1094-102. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00004.
5
Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil.快速通道心脏麻醉:瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼的疗效及安全性比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Feb;21(1):35-40. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
6
Comparison of remifentanil and low-dose fentanyl for fast-track cardiac anesthesia: a prospective randomized study.瑞芬太尼与低剂量芬太尼用于快通道心脏麻醉的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Heart Surg Forum. 2013 Dec;16(6):E324-8. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.2013229.
7
Impact of shorter-acting neuromuscular blocking agents on fast-track recovery of the cardiac surgical patient.短效神经肌肉阻滞剂对心脏手术患者快速康复的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):600-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00015.
8
Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: use of remifentanil combined with intrathecal morphine as an alternative to sufentanil during desflurane anesthesia.快通道心脏麻醉:瑞芬太尼联合鞘内注射吗啡在地氟醚麻醉期间替代舒芬太尼的应用
Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):283-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00006.
9
Remifentanil Compared With Sufentanil Does Not Enhance Fast-Track Possibilities in Cardiac Surgery-A Randomized Study.瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼相比不会增加心脏手术快速康复的可能性——一项随机研究
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1212-20. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
A combination of intrathecal morphine and remifentanil anesthesia for fast-track cardiac anesthesia and surgery.鞘内注射吗啡与瑞芬太尼联合麻醉用于快通道心脏麻醉和手术。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002 Dec;16(6):709-14. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2002.128414.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Opioid Dose Via Targeted Nociception Monitoring.通过靶向伤害性感受监测降低阿片类药物剂量
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Dec 4;117(49):831-832. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0831.
2
Feasibility of On-table Extubation After Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Randomized Clinical Trial.体外循环心脏手术后术中拔管的可行性:一项随机临床试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Sep 24;8(5):e80158. doi: 10.5812/aapm.80158. eCollection 2018 Oct.
3
A specialized post anaesthetic care unit improves fast-track management in cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-month results of the Leipzig fast-track concept.麻醉后护理单元中的心脏手术快速通道治疗:莱比锡快速通道概念的六个月结果
Anesthesiology. 2008 Jul;109(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817881b3.
2
[Cost of intensive care in a German hospital: cost-unit accounting based on the InEK matrix].[德国一家医院的重症监护成本:基于InEK矩阵的成本单位核算]
Anaesthesist. 2008 May;57(5):505-12. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1353-7.
3
Coronary artery bypass grafting in the awake patient combining high thoracic epidural and femoral nerve block: first series of 15 patients.
一个专门的麻醉后护理单元可改善心脏手术的快速康复管理:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Crit Care. 2014 Aug 15;18(4):468. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0468-2.
4
[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation : what do anesthetists need to know?].[经导管主动脉瓣植入术:麻醉医生需要了解什么?]
Anaesthesist. 2011 Dec;60(12):1095-108. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1972-2.
清醒患者冠状动脉旁路移植术中联合高位胸段硬膜外阻滞和股神经阻滞:15例患者的首例系列报道
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):184-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem370.
4
A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.1996年至2003年医学文献中倾向得分匹配的批判性评价。
Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2037-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.3150.
5
Impact of the opening of a specialized cardiac surgery recovery unit on postoperative outcomes in an academic health sciences centre.在一所学术健康科学中心,开设专门的心脏外科康复单元对术后结果的影响。
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;54(9):737-43. doi: 10.1007/BF03026870.
6
Fast-track failure after cardiac surgery: development of a prediction model.心脏手术后的快速失败:预测模型的开发
Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):2875-82. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000248724.02907.1B.
7
Does fast-track treatment lead to a decrease of intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients? A meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.快速通道治疗是否会缩短冠状动脉搭桥患者在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间?一项随机临床试验的Meta回归分析。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1624-34. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217963.87227.7B.
8
[Process remodeling DRG's, SOP's, clinical pathways and the role of the physician].[疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)、标准操作程序(SOP)、临床路径的流程重塑以及医师的作用]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Mar;41(3):135-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925225.
9
Fast-track coronary artery bypass grafting surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil and spinal analgesia with morphine and clonidine.在全身麻醉下使用瑞芬太尼进行快速冠状动脉搭桥手术,并使用吗啡和可乐定进行脊髓镇痛。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005 Feb;19(1):49-53. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.11.009.
10
[Fast-track cardiac anesthesia and perioperative management appropriate for early rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery].[适用于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后早期康复的快速心脏麻醉和围手术期管理]
Masui. 2004 Aug;53(8):898-902.