Tomilovskaia E S, Kirenskaia A V, Lazarev I A, Novototskiĭ-Vlasov V Iu, Kozlovskaia I B
Aviakosm Ekolog Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;42(5):14-8.
Saccades and slow pre-saccadic potentials were investigated in 12 volunteered test-subjects (7 subjects with the leading right eye (RE-group) and 5 subjects with the leading left eye (LE-group) before and after 6-d DI experiment. Visual stimulation was provided with 3 LEDs one of which was located centrally in the field of vision and the other two - 10 degrees left and right along the horizontal axis. The subjects performed the test for antisaccades requiring to produce saccades toward a point symmetrical to displayed stimulus. EEG (monopolar in 19 standard leads) and electrooculogram were registered. Peripheral stimulus activation served as a trigger for backward averaging as a method to obtain slow pre-saccadic potentials (PSPs). Testing before immersion did not reveal any noteworthy differences in saccades produced by the members of both groups. At the same time, amplitude of pre-saccadic negativity (PSN) in LE-group was lower, especially in the frontal region of head, and distinguished by apparent asymmetry throughout the period of analysis. In immersion, latent saccades and percentage of erroneous reactions did not change in the RE-group but increased in the LE-group. Both groups reduced the PSN amplitudes shifting PSN to the right cerebral hemisphere; differences between the groups were masked by immersion. The RE-group was marked by a reliable decline of the PSN amplitude in the frontal leads due to, probably, sensory disintegration and reduced tonic afferentation in immersion. In the LE-group, maximum PSN amplitude was registered in the central region of head equally before and during immersion.
在12名自愿受试对象(7名右眼主导的受试者(RE组)和5名左眼主导的受试者(LE组))中,在6天的头低位卧床实验前后,对扫视和扫视前慢电位进行了研究。视觉刺激由3个发光二极管提供,其中一个位于视野中央,另外两个沿水平轴分别位于左侧和右侧10度处。受试者进行反扫视测试,要求向与显示刺激对称的点产生扫视。记录脑电图(19个标准导联的单极导联)和眼电图。外周刺激激活作为反向平均的触发因素,作为获得扫视前慢电位(PSP)的一种方法。卧床前测试未发现两组成员产生的扫视有任何显著差异。同时,LE组扫视前负电位(PSN)的幅度较低,尤其是在头部额叶区域,并且在整个分析期间表现出明显的不对称。卧床期间,RE组的潜伏扫视和错误反应百分比没有变化,但LE组有所增加。两组都降低了PSN幅度,使PSN向右脑半球转移;两组之间的差异被卧床所掩盖。RE组额叶导联的PSN幅度可靠下降,可能是由于卧床期间感觉解体和紧张性传入减少所致。在LE组中,卧床前后头部中央区域记录到的PSN幅度最大。