Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):143-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099200.
To examine whether the quantity of cartilage or semiquantitative scores actually differ in knees with mild radiographic osteoarthritis compared with knees without osteoarthritis.
Framingham Osteoarthritis Study participants had knee tibiofemoral magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of cartilage. Using three-dimensional FLASH-water excitation sequences, cartilage volume, thickness and subregional cartilage thickness were measured and cartilage scored semiquantitatively (using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score; WORMS). Using weight-bearing radiographs, mild osteoarthritis was defined as Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade 2 and non-osteoarthritis as K/L grade 0. Differences between osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis knees in median cartilage measurements were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Among 948 participants (one knee each), neither cartilage volume nor regional thickness were different in mild versus non-osteoarthritis knees. In mild osteoarthritis, cartilage erosions in focal areas were missed when cartilage was quantified over large regions such as the medial tibia. For some but not all subregions of cartilage, especially among men, cartilage thickness was lower (p<0.05) in mild osteoarthritis than non-osteoarthritis knees. Because semiquantitative scores captured focal erosions, median WORMS scores were higher in mild osteoarthritis than non-osteoarthritis (all p<0.05). In moderate/severe osteoarthritis (K/L grades 3 or 4), osteoarthritis knees had much lower cartilage thickness and higher WORMS scores than knees without osteoarthritis.
In mild osteoarthritis, the focal loss of cartilage is missed by quantitative measures of cartilage volume or thickness over broad areas. Regional cartilage volume and thickness (eg, medial tibia) are not different in mild osteoarthritis versus non-osteoarthritis. Subregional thickness may be decreased in mild osteoarthritis. Semiquantitative scoring that assesses focal cartilage damage differentiates mild osteoarthritis from non-osteoarthritis.
检查膝关节轻度放射学骨关节炎与无骨关节炎患者相比,软骨的数量或半定量评分是否存在差异。
弗雷明汉骨关节炎研究参与者的膝关节进行了基于磁共振成像的软骨测量。使用三维FLASH 水激发序列,测量了软骨体积、厚度和亚区软骨厚度,并使用全器官磁共振成像评分(WORMS)进行半定量评分。使用负重 X 线片,将轻度骨关节炎定义为 Kellgren/Lawrence(K/L)分级 2,非骨关节炎定义为 K/L 分级 0。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验检验骨关节炎和非骨关节炎膝关节之间的中位数软骨测量差异。
在 948 名参与者(每只膝关节)中,无论是软骨体积还是区域厚度,在轻度与非骨关节炎膝关节之间均无差异。在轻度骨关节炎中,当在大区域(如内侧胫骨)定量软骨时,会错过局灶性区域的软骨侵蚀。对于某些但不是所有的软骨亚区,尤其是男性,在轻度骨关节炎中软骨厚度低于非骨关节炎(所有 p<0.05)。由于半定量评分可捕获局灶性侵蚀,因此在轻度骨关节炎中 WORMS 评分中位数高于非骨关节炎(均 p<0.05)。在中度/重度骨关节炎(K/L 分级 3 或 4)中,骨关节炎膝关节的软骨厚度明显低于无骨关节炎的膝关节,WORMS 评分更高。
在轻度骨关节炎中,定量测量大面积软骨体积或厚度会忽略局灶性软骨丢失。与非骨关节炎相比,轻度骨关节炎的区域软骨体积和厚度(例如内侧胫骨)无差异。在轻度骨关节炎中,亚区厚度可能会降低。评估局灶性软骨损伤的半定量评分可将轻度骨关节炎与非骨关节炎区分开来。