Peli E, Yang J A, Goldstein R, Reeves A
Physiological Optics Unit, Eye Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Aug;8(8):1352-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.8.001352.
Perceived contrast was measured under natural viewing conditions with the use of contrast-matching and magnitude-estimation paradigms and found to be independent of luminance over a range of luminances from 37.5 down to 8 cd/m2. However, this contrast constancy broke down when the dimmer target was below 8 cd/m2. The perceived contrast of the dimmer target then fell below that expected from contrast constancy. The extended range of contrast constancy previously reported [J. Physiol. 252, 627 (1975); Vision Res. 16, 1419 (1976)] has been thought to imply neural mechanisms with unlimited constancy, but these researchers permitted differential adaptation to the brighter and dimmer targets, which were seen haploscopically (by different eyes). As our natural-viewing procedure ensured that both bright and dim targets were presented to retinal areas in a roughly constant state of adaptation, our failure to find extended contrast constancy implies an important limitation on the neural processing of contrast.
在自然观看条件下,使用对比度匹配和量级估计范式测量了感知对比度,发现在37.5至8 cd/m²的亮度范围内,感知对比度与亮度无关。然而,当较暗目标低于8 cd/m²时,这种对比度恒常性就会失效。此时,较暗目标的感知对比度低于对比度恒常性所预期的值。先前报道的对比度恒常性的扩展范围[《生理学杂志》252, 627 (1975); 《视觉研究》16, 1419 (1976)]被认为暗示了具有无限恒常性的神经机制,但这些研究人员允许对较亮和较暗目标进行差异适应,这些目标是单眼观察的(通过不同的眼睛)。由于我们的自然观看程序确保了明亮和昏暗目标都呈现给处于大致恒定适应状态的视网膜区域,我们未能发现扩展的对比度恒常性意味着对比度神经处理存在重要限制。