Suppr超能文献

正负极性对比敏感度测量应用程序

Positive and negative polarity contrast sensitivity measuring app.

作者信息

Hwang Alex D, Peli Eli

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute - Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA02114, USA.

出版信息

IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2016;2016. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-122. Epub 2016 Feb 14.

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity (CS) quantifies an observer's ability to detect the smallest (threshold) luminance difference between a target and its surrounding. In clinical settings, printed letter contrast charts are commonly used, and the contrast of the letter stimuli is specified by the Weber contrast definition. Those paper-printed charts use negative polarity contrast (NP, dark letters on bright background) and are not available with positive polarity contrast (PP, bright letters on dark background), as needed in a number of applications. We implemented a mobile CS measuring app supporting both NP and PP contrast stimuli that mimic the paper charts for NP. A novel modified Weber definition was developed to specify the contrast of PP letters. The validity of the app is established in comparison with the paper chart. We found that our app generates more accurate and a wider range of contrast stimuli than the paper chart (especially at the critical high CS, low contrast range), and found a clear difference between NP and PP CS measures (CS>CS) despite the symmetry afforded by the modified Weber contrast definition. Our app provides a convenient way to measure CS in both lighted and dark environments.

摘要

对比敏感度(CS)量化了观察者检测目标与其周围环境之间最小(阈值)亮度差异的能力。在临床环境中,通常使用印刷字母对比图表,字母刺激的对比度由韦伯对比度定义指定。那些纸质印刷图表使用负极性对比度(NP,亮背景上的暗字母),而许多应用所需的正极性对比度(PP,暗背景上的亮字母)则没有。我们开发了一款移动CS测量应用程序,它支持NP和PP对比刺激,NP刺激模仿纸质图表。我们开发了一种新颖的改良韦伯定义来指定PP字母的对比度。通过与纸质图表比较确定了该应用程序的有效性。我们发现,我们的应用程序比纸质图表能产生更准确、范围更广的对比刺激(特别是在关键的高CS、低对比度范围内),并且尽管改良的韦伯对比度定义提供了对称性,但NP和PP CS测量之间仍存在明显差异(CS>CS)。我们的应用程序提供了一种在明亮和黑暗环境中测量CS的便捷方法。

相似文献

1
Positive and negative polarity contrast sensitivity measuring app.正负极性对比敏感度测量应用程序
IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2016;2016. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-122. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
2
The effect of contrast polarity on letter identification.对比度极性对字母识别的影响。
Vision Res. 1993 Dec;33(17):2491-7. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90129-k.
3
6
Mobile app Aston contrast sensitivity test.移动应用程序阿斯顿对比敏感度测试。
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Jul;99(4):350-5. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12362. Epub 2016 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of visual function using mobile Apps.使用移动应用程序评估视觉功能。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(12):2406-2414. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03031-2. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Age-related normal limits for spatial vision.年龄相关性空间视觉的正常范围。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1363-1378. doi: 10.1111/opo.13037. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
7
New Contrast Metric for Realistic Display Performance Measure.用于逼真显示性能测量的新对比度指标。
Dig Tech Pap. 2016 May;47(1):982-985. doi: 10.1002/sdtp.10893. Epub 2016 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.中间视觉和暗视觉照明下的视觉。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01594. eCollection 2014.
3
Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.iPad字母对比度敏感度测试的验证
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar;91(3):291-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000158.
5
Psychophysical contrast calibration.心理物理学对比度校准。
Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
6
Contrast thresholds of the human eye.人眼的对比度阈值。
J Opt Soc Am. 1946 Nov;36(11):624-43. doi: 10.1364/josa.36.000624.
7
On-road driving with moderate visual field loss.视野轻度受损时的道路驾驶。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Aug;82(8):657-67. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000175558.33268.b5.
8
Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.改进字母对比敏感度测试的设计。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):2225-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1198.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验