Suppr超能文献

脑出血后患者的死亡方式。

How patients die after intracerebral hemorrhage.

作者信息

Naidech Andrew M, Bernstein Richard A, Bassin Sarice L, Garg Rajeev K, Liebling Storm, Bendok Bernard R, Batjer H Hunt, Bleck Thomas P

机构信息

Northwestern University, 710 N Lake Shore Drive 11th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):45-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9186-z. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Severity of illness scores predict all-cause mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but do not differentiate between proximate mechanisms or predict the timing. We hypothesized that death by neurologic criteria [brain death (BD)], withdrawal of life support, and cardiovascular death would be distinct after ICH.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with spontaneous ICH without underlying vascular malformation or neoplasm. We recorded clinical data and the proximate mechanism of death (BD, withdrawal of life support, cardiovascular death, or other cause). Time to death was compared with Kaplan-Meier methods (log-rank test). Data are median (IQR).

RESULTS

Among 89 patients, 15 had withdrawal of life support, 5 had BD, 2 died from cardiac arrest, and 3 died from other causes. Among patients who died, ICH score, age, Glasgow Coma Scale, NIH Stroke Scale, and proximate cause were not associated with the proximate mechanism of death. The time to death was different (P < 0.001) depending on the proximate mechanism. Patients with BD died 1 [0-1] 1 day after ICH, withdrawal of life support led to death 5 [1-13] days after ICH, cardiac death occurred 35 [35-85] days after ICH, and other causes led to death 33 [26-33] days after ICH. Among patients where life support was withdrawn, a higher ICH score on admission was related to earlier death (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximate mechanisms of death after ICH occur at distinct times. Withdrawal of life support leads to earlier death in patients with a higher severity of injury. Medical causes of death can be effectively prevented after ICH.

摘要

引言

疾病严重程度评分可预测脑出血(ICH)后的全因死亡率,但无法区分直接机制或预测死亡时间。我们假设脑出血后,根据神经学标准判定的死亡(脑死亡[BD])、生命支持撤除和心血管死亡情况会有所不同。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了无潜在血管畸形或肿瘤的自发性脑出血患者。记录临床数据及死亡的直接机制(脑死亡、生命支持撤除、心血管死亡或其他原因)。采用Kaplan-Meier方法(对数秩检验)比较死亡时间。数据以中位数(四分位间距)表示。

结果

89例患者中,15例生命支持被撤除,5例脑死亡,2例死于心脏骤停,3例死于其他原因。在死亡患者中,脑出血评分、年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表及直接死因与死亡的直接机制无关。根据直接机制不同,死亡时间存在差异(P<0.001)。脑死亡患者在脑出血后1[0-1]天死亡,生命支持撤除导致患者在脑出血后5[1-13]天死亡,心血管死亡发生在脑出血后35[35-85]天,其他原因导致患者在脑出血后33[26-33]天死亡。在生命支持被撤除的患者中,入院时较高的脑出血评分与较早死亡相关(P=0.002)。

结论

脑出血后死亡的直接机制发生时间不同。生命支持撤除导致损伤严重程度较高的患者更早死亡。脑出血后可有效预防医学原因导致的死亡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验