Moser S A, Box M J, Patel M, Amaya M, Schelonka R, Waites K B
Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249-7331, USA.
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Apr;71(4):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Many isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are indistinguishable when compared using the standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing method. This may present a problem when investigating local outbreaks of MRSA transmission in a healthcare setting. It also impedes investigation of the widely disseminated community-acquired MRSA (USA 300-0114) in the inpatient setting, which is displacing other traditional hospital-acquired PFGE types. Combination of methods, including multiple-locus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, have been used with, or in place of, PFGE to characterise MRSA for epidemiological purposes. These methods are technically challenging, time-consuming and expensive and are rarely feasible except in large laboratories in tertiary care medical centres. Another method, which is simpler and with faster turnaround time, is multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). We investigated the utility of MLVA to distinguish common PFGE types. The results suggest that MLVA can be used to identify unrelated strains with identical PFGE patterns or confirm close genetic composition of linked isolates. MLVA could potentially be used in conjunction with PFGE to validate relationships, but further prospective evaluation of these relationships will be required in order to define the proper role, if any, for use of this method in hospital epidemiology.
当使用标准脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)分型方法进行比较时,许多耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)分离株难以区分。在医疗机构中调查MRSA传播的局部暴发时,这可能会带来问题。它还阻碍了对住院环境中广泛传播的社区获得性MRSA(USA 300 - 0114)的调查,这种菌株正在取代其他传统的医院获得性PFGE类型。包括多位点序列分型(MLST)、spa分型和葡萄球菌盒式染色体mec(SCCmec)分型在内的多种方法已与PFGE一起使用或替代PFGE,用于从流行病学角度对MRSA进行特征分析。这些方法在技术上具有挑战性、耗时且昂贵,除了三级医疗中心的大型实验室外,很少可行。另一种更简单、周转时间更快的方法是多位点可变数目串联重复分析(MLVA)。我们研究了MLVA区分常见PFGE类型的效用。结果表明,MLVA可用于识别具有相同PFGE模式的不相关菌株或确认相关分离株的紧密遗传组成。MLVA有可能与PFGE结合使用以验证关系,但为了确定该方法在医院流行病学中的适当作用(如果有的话),还需要对这些关系进行进一步的前瞻性评估。