• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的急诊医疗服务

Access to emergency care in the United States.

作者信息

Carr Brendan G, Branas Charles C, Metlay Joshua P, Sullivan Ashley F, Camargo Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.016. Epub 2009 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.016
PMID:19201059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2728684/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Rapid access to emergency services is essential for emergency care-sensitive conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, and major trauma. We seek to determine US population access to an emergency department (ED).

METHODS

The National Emergency Department Inventories-USA was used to identify the location, annual visit volume, and teaching status of all EDs in the United States. EDs were categorized as any ED, by patient volume, and by teaching status. Driving distances, driving speeds, and out-of-hospital times were estimated with validated models and adjusted for population density. Access was determined by summing the population that could reach an ED within the specified intervals.

RESULTS

Overall, 71% of the US population has access to an ED within 30 minutes, and 98% has access within 60 minutes. Access to teaching hospitals was more limited, with 16% having access within 30 minutes and 44% within 60 minutes. Rural states had lower access to all types of EDs.

CONCLUSION

Although the majority of the US population has access to an ED, there are regional disparities in ED access, especially by rurality. Future efforts should measure the relationship between access to emergency services and outcomes for emergency care-sensitive conditions. The development of a regionalized emergency care delivery system should be explored.

摘要

研究目的

对于急性心肌梗死、中风、败血症和重大创伤等急诊护理敏感疾病,快速获得急诊服务至关重要。我们试图确定美国人口获得急诊科(ED)服务的情况。

方法

使用美国国家急诊科库存来确定美国所有急诊科的位置、年就诊量和教学状况。急诊科按类型、患者数量和教学状况进行分类。利用经过验证的模型估计驾车距离、驾车速度和院外时间,并根据人口密度进行调整。通过汇总在指定时间间隔内能够到达急诊科的人口数量来确定可及性。

结果

总体而言,71%的美国人口能够在30分钟内到达急诊科,98%的人口能够在60分钟内到达。教学医院的可及性更有限,16%的人口能够在30分钟内到达,44%的人口能够在60分钟内到达。农村州各类急诊科的可及性较低。

结论

尽管大多数美国人口能够获得急诊科服务,但急诊科可及性存在地区差异,尤其是在农村地区。未来的努力应衡量获得急诊服务与急诊护理敏感疾病结局之间的关系。应探索建立区域化急诊护理提供系统。

相似文献

1
Access to emergency care in the United States.美国的急诊医疗服务
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.016. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
2
Distribution of emergency departments according to annual visit volume and urban-rural status: implications for access and staffing.根据年就诊量和城乡状况分配急诊科:对可及性和人员配备的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;17(12):1390-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00924.x.
3
Epidemiology of Penile Fractures in United States Emergency Departments: Access to Care Disparities May Lead to Suboptimal Outcomes.美国急诊部阴茎骨折的流行病学:获得治疗的差异可能导致治疗效果不理想。
J Sex Med. 2019 Feb;16(2):248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.009.
4
Access to High Pediatric-Readiness Emergency Care in the United States.美国获得高度儿童准备急诊护理的途径。
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:225-232.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.074. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems.ACCESS:急诊卒中系统中的急性脑血管护理
Arch Neurol. 2010 Oct;67(10):1210-8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.250.
6
National travel distances for emergency care.国家紧急护理旅行距离。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07743-7.
7
A pilot study describing access to emergency care in two states using a model emergency care categorization system.一项使用模型急救分类系统描述两个州紧急护理可及性的初步研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):894-903. doi: 10.1111/acem.12208.
8
Factors associated with the disposition of severely injured patients initially seen at non–trauma center emergency departments: disparities by insurance status.与最初在非创伤中心急诊部就诊的严重创伤患者处置相关的因素:保险状况的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):422-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4398.
9
Predictors of emergency department death for patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.破裂性腹主动脉瘤患者急诊死亡的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Sep;56(3):651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 May 3.
10
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on GIS-based spatial analysis of emergency response for disaster management: Focusing on Seoul.一项基于地理信息系统的灾害管理应急响应空间分析研究:以首尔为重点。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 22;10(7):e28669. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28669. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Where the road ends: emergency care sensitive conditions drive excess mortality in medevac-dependent rural Alaska.路在何方:在依赖医疗后送的阿拉斯加农村地区,急救敏感型疾病导致过高死亡率。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214444.
3
Burden of Hyperlipidemia, Cardiovascular Mortality, and COVID-19: A Retrospective-Cohort Analysis of US Data.

本文引用的文献

1
The Zerhouni challenge: defining the fundamental hypothesis of emergency care research.泽尔胡尼的挑战:界定急救护理研究的基本假设。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 May;49(5):696-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.02.012.
2
A profile of US emergency departments in 2001.2001年美国急诊科概况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
3
A meta-analysis of prehospital care times for trauma.创伤院前护理时间的荟萃分析。
高脂血症、心血管疾病死亡率与 COVID-19 的负担:基于美国数据的回顾性队列分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037381. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037381. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
4
A Community-Engaged Approach to Understanding Suicide in a Small Rural County in Georgia: A Two-Phase Content Analysis of Individual and Focus Group Interviews.以社区为基础的方式理解佐治亚州一个农村小县的自杀问题:个体和焦点小组访谈的两阶段内容分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;20(24):7145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247145.
5
Comparison of US emergency departments by HIV priority jurisdiction designation: A case for geographically targeted screening in teaching hospitals.按 HIV 优先管辖指定对美国急诊科进行比较:在教学医院进行有针对性的地理筛查的理由。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292869. eCollection 2023.
6
National Trends in the Use of Specialty Consultations in Emergency Department Visits, 2009 to 2019.2009年至2019年急诊科就诊中专科会诊使用情况的全国趋势。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;82(5):634-635. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
7
Access to Athletic Trainers and Emergency Medical Services Activations for Sport-Related Injuries.运动相关损伤中获取运动防护师和紧急医疗服务的激活。
J Athl Train. 2023 May 1;58(5):387-392. doi: 10.4085/234.22.
8
Effect of on-site first aid for industrial injuries on healthcare utilization after medical treatment: a 4-year retrospective longitudinal study.工伤现场急救对治疗后医疗资源利用的影响:一项为期4年的回顾性纵向研究。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023 Jul 13;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00380-8.
9
Emergency Care Sensitive Conditions in Brazil: A Geographic Information System Approach to Timely Hospital Access.巴西的急诊护理敏感疾病:一种利用地理信息系统实现及时就医的方法。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Sep 10;4:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100063. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
A system in crisis: exploring how recent emergency department closures influence potential access to emergency care in Ontario.一个陷入危机的系统:探索最近急诊部门的关闭如何影响安大略省获得急诊护理的可能性。
CJEM. 2023 Mar;25(3):218-223. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00460-y. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Apr-Jun;10(2):198-206. doi: 10.1080/10903120500541324.
4
A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.一项关于创伤中心护理对死亡率影响的全国性评估。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):366-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052049.
5
Access to trauma centers in the United States.美国创伤中心的可及性。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2626-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2626.
6
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).ACC/AHA ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南——执行摘要。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订1999年急性心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):671-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):858-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000117317.18092.e4.
8
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2001年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2003 Jun 4(335):1-29.
9
National inventory of hospital trauma centers.国家医院创伤中心清单。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 26;289(12):1515-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.12.1515.
10
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.早期目标导向治疗在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗中的应用
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307.