Salgado Ricardo Julio Cabrales, Moura-Netto Cacio, Yamazaki Andrea Kanako, Cardoso Luciano Natividade, de Moura Abílio Albuquerque Maranhão, Prokopowitsch Igor
Department of Endodontics, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Apr;107(4):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
Calcium hydroxide dressing residuals can compromise endodontic sealing. This study evaluated the cleaning efficacy of different endodontic irrigants in removing calcium hydroxide by SEM image analysis. Fifty-four single-rooted mandibular premolars were instrumented to a master apical file #60 and dressed with calcium hydroxide. After 36 hours, the teeth were reopened and Ca(OH)(2) medication was removed by 5 different experimental groups: 0.5% NaOCl (G1), EDTA-C (G2), citric acid (G3), EDTA-T (G4), and re-instrumentation with MAF using NaOCl and lubrificant, followed by EDTA-T (G5). The roots were split in the buccal-lingual direction and prepared for SEM analysis in cervical, middle, and apical thirds (9, 6, and 3mm from the apex). Five blinded examiners evaluated the wall cleanliness using a scale from 1 to 5. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis at 5% level of significance. Group G5 had the best results in all thirds, with significant statistical differences compared to all other groups in the middle and coronal third, and to G1 in the apical third. On the other hand, G1, only flushed with NaOCl, had the worst results, with statistical differences in all thirds compared to the other groups. The best cleanliness was achieved by G4 and G5 groups. The recapitulation of MAF in combination with irrigants improved the removal of calcium hydroxide medication better than an irrigant flush alone.
氢氧化钙糊剂残留会影响根管封闭效果。本研究通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像分析评估了不同根管冲洗剂去除氢氧化钙的清洁效果。选取54颗下颌单根前磨牙,预备至主尖锉#60,并用氢氧化钙糊剂充填。36小时后,重新打开髓腔,将牙齿分为5个不同的实验组以去除Ca(OH)₂药物:0.5%次氯酸钠(G1组)、螯合性乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA-C,G2组)、柠檬酸(G3组)、润湿性乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA-T,G4组),以及使用次氯酸钠和润滑剂重新用主尖锉预备,随后用EDTA-T冲洗(G5组)。沿颊舌向劈开牙根,制备用于SEM分析的样本,分别取自牙颈部、中部和根尖部(距根尖9mm、6mm和3mm处)。5名不知情的检查者使用1至5分的评分标准评估根管壁清洁度。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。G5组在所有部位的清洁效果最佳,在中部和冠部与所有其他组相比有显著统计学差异,在根尖部与G1组相比有显著统计学差异。另一方面,仅用次氯酸钠冲洗 的G1组效果最差,在所有部位与其他组相比均有统计学差异。G4组和G5组的清洁度最佳。与单独使用冲洗剂相比,主尖锉再预备联合冲洗剂能更好地去除氢氧化钙药物。