West Greg L, Welsh Timothy N, Pratt Jay
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada.
J Mot Behav. 2009 Mar;41(2):117-27. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.2.117-127.
Although a considerable amount of research has investigated the planning and production of saccadic eye movements, it remains unclear whether (a) central planning processes prior to movement onset largely determine these eye movements or (b) they receive online correction during the actual trajectory. To investigate this issue, the authors measured the spatial position of the eye at specific kinematic markers during saccadic movements (i.e., peak acceleration, peak velocity, peak deceleration, saccade endpoint). In 2 experiments, the authors examined saccades ranging in amplitude from 4 to 20 degrees and computed the variability profiles (SD) of eye position at each kinematic marker and the proportion of explained variance (R2) between each kinematic marker and the saccade endpoint. In Experiment 1, the authors examined differences in the kinematic signature of saccadic online control between eye movements made in gap or overlap conditions. In Experiment 2, the authors examined the online control of saccades made from stored target information after delays of 500, 1,500, and 3,500 ms. Findings evince a robust and consistent feedback-based system of online oculomotor control during saccadic eye movements.
尽管已有大量研究探讨了扫视眼动的规划与产生,但仍不清楚:(a) 运动开始前的中枢规划过程在很大程度上决定了这些眼动,还是 (b) 它们在实际轨迹中接受在线校正。为了研究这个问题,作者在扫视运动期间的特定运动学标记点(即峰值加速度、峰值速度、峰值减速度、扫视终点)测量了眼睛的空间位置。在两项实验中,作者研究了幅度在4度至20度之间的扫视,并计算了每个运动学标记点处眼睛位置的变异性分布(标准差)以及每个运动学标记点与扫视终点之间的可解释方差比例(R2)。在实验1中,作者研究了在间隙或重叠条件下进行的眼动之间扫视在线控制的运动学特征差异。在实验2中,作者研究了在延迟500、1500和3500毫秒后根据存储的目标信息进行的扫视的在线控制。研究结果表明,在扫视眼动过程中存在一个强大且一致的基于反馈的在线眼动控制体系。