Trauer Tom, Pedwell Glenda, Gill Lisa
Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Mental Health Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2009 Feb;33(1):144-51. doi: 10.1071/ah090144.
Routine outcome measures (ROM) have now been introduced into all Australian public mental health services, but experience suggests that many clinical staff lack expertise in using them. In 2005 under the Quality Through Outcomes Network (QUATRO), the Victorian Department of Human Services set up three teams aimed at consolidating the use of ROM and furthering sustainability through a variety of peer-support activities. We report on an initiative undertaken by one of these teams. QUATRO team members attended team meetings of four adult community teams (three metropolitan and one rural) fortnightly over about 3 months. QUATRO staff contributed to discussion of outcome measures during routine clinical review, using local and national outcome measurement data and tools, and their own expertise. Attitudes of clinicians toward ROM in general and the specific instruments were assessed at the beginning and end of the period, and again after about 5 months. Qualitative findings consist of observations of factors that assist and hinder use of ROM. The initiative identified steps that staff can take to make ROM more useful in their work.
常规结果测量(ROM)现已被引入澳大利亚所有的公共心理健康服务机构,但经验表明,许多临床工作人员缺乏使用这些测量方法的专业知识。2005年,维多利亚州人类服务部在“通过结果实现质量”网络(QUATRO)的支持下,成立了三个团队,旨在巩固ROM的使用,并通过各种同伴支持活动进一步实现可持续性。我们报告其中一个团队开展的一项举措。QUATRO团队成员在大约3个月的时间里,每两周参加一次四个成人社区团队(三个城市团队和一个农村团队)的团队会议。QUATRO工作人员在常规临床审查期间,利用当地和全国的结果测量数据及工具,以及他们自己的专业知识,参与有关结果测量的讨论。在该阶段开始和结束时,以及大约5个月后,对临床医生对ROM总体及具体工具的态度进行了评估。定性研究结果包括对有助于和阻碍ROM使用的因素的观察。该举措确定了工作人员可以采取的步骤,以使ROM在他们的工作中更有用。