Weir M R, Josselson J, Ekelund L G, Korc M, Pool J L, Stein G H, Wolbach R A, Champion D
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Jun;5(3):205-13.
The effects of nicardipine and propranolol on patients' quality of life were compared during a double-blind, multicentre, parallel, randomised study of hypertension therapy. After a placebo run-in period, the doses for each patient were successfully titrated to reduce supine diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mmHg with either nicardipine 60 or 90 mg/day (123 patients) or with propranolol 90-240 mg/day (120 patients). Both drugs demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Total duration of therapy ranged from 6-12 weeks. The Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire was used to assess the effect of each treatment on the patients' quality of life. The overall quality of life score for patients on nicardipine showed a tendency toward improvement, while for those on propranolol, the trend was toward overall worsening. The differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant for males (P = 0.02). The analysis of the separate components of this evaluation demonstrated that physical mobility was reported to be decreased more for the propranolol-treated patients than for the nicardipine-treated patients (P = 0.02). In contrast to the propranolol-treated patients, the nicardipine-treated patients reported improvements for sleep, social life, work, sex life, and for activities related to hobbies and interests. A second questionnaire was used to assess the effects of the therapies on work productivity. Among those patients who worked for pay, more patients treated with propranolol than those treated with nicardipine rated themselves as less productive at work (P = 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项高血压治疗的双盲、多中心、平行、随机研究中,比较了尼卡地平和普萘洛尔对患者生活质量的影响。经过安慰剂导入期后,分别用尼卡地平60或90毫克/天(123例患者)或普萘洛尔90 - 240毫克/天(120例患者)成功滴定每位患者的剂量,以将仰卧位舒张压降至90 mmHg以下。两种药物在降低收缩压和舒张压方面显示出相似的疗效。治疗总时长为6 - 12周。使用诺丁汉健康状况问卷评估每种治疗对患者生活质量的影响。服用尼卡地平的患者总体生活质量评分有改善趋势,而服用普萘洛尔的患者则呈总体恶化趋势。两组治疗在男性患者中差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。对该评估各单独成分的分析表明,普萘洛尔治疗的患者报告的身体活动能力下降程度比尼卡地平治疗的患者更大(P = 0.02)。与普萘洛尔治疗的患者相反,尼卡地平治疗的患者报告在睡眠、社交生活、工作、性生活以及与爱好和兴趣相关的活动方面有改善。使用第二份问卷评估治疗对工作效率的影响。在有薪工作的患者中,认为自己工作效率较低的普萘洛尔治疗患者比尼卡地平治疗患者更多(P = 0.02)。(摘要截选至250字)