Bulpitt C J, Fletcher A E
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):523-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00006.
This review considers the choice of dimensions to be assessed and the practical problems of measuring quality of life in hypertensive patients. The dimensions of symptomatic well-being, psychological well-being, sleep, sexual function and cognitive function should be assessed. Symptomatic well-being may be measured by many different instruments, and that devised by the authors has been used extensively. The results in different trials may therefore be examined for consistency and sensitivity. Psychological well-being has been assessed by the Psychological General Well-Being Index, the Symptom Rating Test and the Profile of Mood States. The response of these instruments is discussed. The assessment of sleep, sexual function and cognitive function is also described. It is recommended that quality-of-life instruments to be employed in trials of antihypertensive drugs are known to be sensitive to the effects of such drugs.
本综述探讨了在高血压患者中评估生活质量时维度的选择以及测量方面的实际问题。应评估症状性幸福感、心理幸福感、睡眠、性功能和认知功能等维度。症状性幸福感可以通过多种不同的工具进行测量,作者设计的工具已被广泛使用。因此,可以检查不同试验中的结果是否具有一致性和敏感性。心理幸福感已通过总体心理健康指数、症状评定测试和情绪状态剖面图进行评估。文中讨论了这些工具的反应情况。还描述了睡眠、性功能和认知功能的评估。建议在抗高血压药物试验中使用的生活质量工具应对此类药物的效果敏感。