Gregory Jonathan J, Mohil Randip S, Ng Aaron B, Warner James G, Hodgson Stephen P
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Bolton Hospital, Minerva Road, Farnworth, Bolton, BL4 0JE, United Kingdom.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Dec;74(6):761-5.
A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone surgery for delayed union or non-union of a scaphoid fracture. This was conducted to investigate if there was a difference in outcome between patients treated with the Acutrak screw or the Herbert screw. Twenty two cases were treated with a Herbert screw and 23 with an Acutrak screw. The patient demographics, aetiology of injury and fracture types were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in union rate or time to union for fractures treated with the Herbert screw or the Acutrak screw. There appears to be no difference in outcome for cases of scaphoid fracture delayed union and non-union treated with either the Herbert screw or the Acutrak screw.
对因舟骨骨折延迟愈合或不愈合而接受手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。目的是研究使用Acutrak螺钉或Herbert螺钉治疗的患者在治疗结果上是否存在差异。22例患者使用Herbert螺钉治疗,23例使用Acutrak螺钉治疗。两组患者的人口统计学特征、损伤病因和骨折类型相似。使用Herbert螺钉或Acutrak螺钉治疗的骨折在愈合率或愈合时间上没有显著差异。对于舟骨骨折延迟愈合和不愈合的病例,使用Herbert螺钉或Acutrak螺钉治疗的结果似乎没有差异。