Suppr超能文献

比较 MAG 无头 Herbert 螺钉与钛 Herbert 螺钉治疗舟状骨骨折的骨内固定术:SCAMAG 临床试验的随机对照方案。

Comparison of SCAphoid fracture osteosynthesis by MAGnesium-based headless Herbert screws with titanium Herbert screws: protocol for the randomized controlled SCAMAG clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Amedon GmbH, Willy-Brandt-Allee 31c, 23554, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 7;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2723-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. They often need to be treated by surgery, where the use of a compression screw is the globally accepted gold standard. Surgeons may choose between different implant materials including titanium alloys, which remain in the body or are removed after healing. An alternative are biodegradable magnesium-based implants. Properties of magnesium alloys include high stability, osteoconductivity, potential reduction of infections and few artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of magnesium-based compression screws compared with titanium Herbert screws for scaphoid fractures.

METHODS

The trial is designed as a multicenter, blinded observer, randomized controlled parallel two-group post market trial. Approximately 190 patients will be randomized (1:1) with stratification by center either to titanium or magnesium-based compression screws. Follow-up is 1 year per patient. Surgical procedures and aftercare will be performed according to the German treatment guideline for scaphoid fractures. The first primary endpoint is the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score after 6 months. The second primary endpoint is a composite safety endpoint including bone union until 6 months, no adverse device effect (ADE) during surgery or wound healing and no serious ADE or reoperation within 1 year. The third primary endpoint is the difference in change MRI artifacts over time. Non-inferiority will be investigated for primary endpoints 1 (t-test confidence interval) and 2 (Wilson's score interval) using both the full analysis set (FAS) and the per protocol population at the one-sided 2.5% test-level. Superiority of magnesium over titanium screws will be established using the FAS at the two-sided 5% test-level (Welch test) only if non-inferiority has been established for both primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints include quality of life.

DISCUSSION

This study will inform care providers whether biodegradable magnesium-based implants are non-inferior to standard titanium Herbert screws for the treatment of scaphoid fractures in terms of wrist function and safety. Furthermore, superiority of magnesium-based implants may be demonstrated using MRI, which is used as surrogate endpoint for screw degradation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS, DRKS00013368 . Registered Dec 04, 2017.

摘要

背景

舟状骨骨折是最常见的腕骨骨折。它们通常需要通过手术治疗,其中使用加压螺钉是全球公认的金标准。外科医生可以在不同的植入物材料之间进行选择,包括钛合金,这些材料在愈合后留在体内或被取出。另一种选择是可生物降解的镁基植入物。镁合金的特性包括高稳定性、骨传导性、潜在减少感染和磁共振成像 (MRI) 中的伪影较少。本试验的目的是证明与钛 Herbert 螺钉相比,镁基加压螺钉治疗舟状骨骨折不劣于后者。

方法

该试验设计为多中心、盲法观察者、随机对照平行两臂上市后试验。大约 190 名患者将按照中心分层(1:1)随机分为钛或镁基加压螺钉组。每位患者的随访时间为 1 年。手术程序和术后护理将根据德国舟状骨骨折治疗指南进行。主要终点是 6 个月后的患者腕关节评估(PRWE)评分。次要终点是包括 6 个月内骨愈合、手术或伤口愈合过程中无不良设备效应(ADE)以及 1 年内无严重 ADE 或再次手术的复合安全性终点。第三个主要终点是随时间推移 MRI 伪影变化的差异。主要终点 1(t 检验置信区间)和 2(Wilson 评分区间)将使用全分析集(FAS)和方案人群进行非劣效性检验,检验水平为单侧 2.5%。仅当两个主要终点都已证明非劣效性时,才会使用 FAS 在双侧 5%检验水平(Welch 检验)上证明镁螺钉优于钛螺钉。次要终点包括生活质量。

讨论

该研究将为医疗保健提供者提供信息,了解可生物降解的镁基植入物在腕关节功能和安全性方面是否不劣于标准的钛 Herbert 螺钉治疗舟状骨骨折。此外,使用 MRI 作为螺钉降解的替代终点,可能会证明镁基植入物具有优越性。

试验注册

DRKS,DRKS00013368。于 2017 年 12 月 4 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b625/6685162/900b3de3e182/12891_2019_2723_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验