• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏护理需求证书(CON):关于需求证书贡献的争议。

Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.

作者信息

Ho Vivian, Ku-Goto Meei-Hsiang, Jollis James G

机构信息

Department of Economics, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):483-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00933.x. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00933.x
PMID:19207590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2677050/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test whether state Certificate of Need (CON) regulations influence procedural mortality or the provision of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

DATA SOURCES

Medicare inpatient claims obtained for 1989-2002 for patients age 65+ who received CABG or PCI.

STUDY DESIGN

We used differences-in-differences regression analysis to compare states that dropped CON during the sample period with states that kept the regulations. We examined procedural mortality, the number of hospitals in the state performing CABG or PCI, mean hospital volume, and statewide procedure volume for CABG and PCI.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

States that dropped CON experienced lower CABG mortality rates relative to states that kept CON, although the differential is not permanent. No such mortality difference is found for PCI. Dropping CON is associated with more providers statewide and lower mean hospital volume for both CABG and PCI. However, statewide procedure counts remain the same.

CONCLUSIONS

We find no evidence that CON regulations are associated with higher quality CABG or PCI. Future research should examine whether the greater number of hospitals performing revascularization after CON removal raises expenditures due to the building of more facilities, or lowers expenditures due to enhanced price competition.

摘要

目的

检验州医疗需求证书(CON)法规是否会影响手术死亡率或冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的实施情况。

数据来源

获取了1989 - 2002年65岁及以上接受CABG或PCI治疗患者的医疗保险住院理赔数据。

研究设计

我们采用双重差分回归分析,将样本期内取消CON的州与保留该法规的州进行比较。我们考察了手术死亡率、该州进行CABG或PCI的医院数量、医院平均手术量以及CABG和PCI的全州手术量。

主要发现

与保留CON的州相比,取消CON的州CABG死亡率较低,不过这种差异并非永久性的。PCI未发现此类死亡率差异。取消CON与全州更多的医疗服务提供者以及CABG和PCI的较低医院平均手术量相关。然而,全州手术量总数保持不变。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明CON法规与更高质量的CABG或PCI相关。未来的研究应考察取消CON后进行血运重建的医院数量增加是否会因更多设施建设而增加支出,或者是否会因价格竞争加剧而降低支出。

相似文献

1
Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.心脏护理需求证书(CON):关于需求证书贡献的争议。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):483-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00933.x. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
2
Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.心脏需求证明法规以及血运重建服务的可及性与使用情况。
Am Heart J. 2007 Oct;154(4):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.031.
3
Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation.在有和没有需求证明监管的州,医疗保险受益人群体在冠状动脉搭桥手术后的死亡率。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1859-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1859.
4
Contemporary impact of state certificate-of-need regulations for cardiac surgery: an analysis using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Surgery Database.心脏手术州需求证书法规的当代影响:一项使用胸外科医师协会国家心脏手术数据库的分析
Circulation. 2006 Nov 14;114(20):2122-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591214. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
5
State deregulation and Medicare costs for acute cardiac care.州监管放松与急性心脏护理的医疗保险费用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Apr;70(2):185-205. doi: 10.1177/1077558712459681. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
6
Certificate of need regulations and use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉血运重建的需求证明规定及应用
JAMA. 2006 May 10;295(18):2141-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.18.2141.
7
Does certificate of need affect cardiac outcomes and costs?需求证明会影响心脏疾病的治疗结果和成本吗?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2006 Dec;6(4):300-24. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9008-9. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
8
Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes.全州需求证书监管规定与经皮冠状动脉介入术适宜性和结局的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010373. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010373.
9
Association of State Certificate of Need Regulation With Procedural Volume, Market Share, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.州需求监管证书与医疗保险受益人的程序量、市场份额和结果的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2058-2068. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21115.
10
Trends during 1993-2004 in the availability and use of revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in markets affected by certificate of need regulations.1993-2004 年在需求方规制影响的市场中急性心肌梗死后血运重建的可及性和应用变化趋势
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Apr;67(2):213-31. doi: 10.1177/1077558709346565. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology regulation reconsidered: The effects of certificate of need policies on the quantity and quality of diagnostic imaging.重新审视技术监管:需求证明政策对诊断成像数量和质量的影响。
J Health Econ. 2025 Aug;102:103020. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103020. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
2
Government Regulation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume, Access and Outcomes: Insights From the Washington State Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.政府监管与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量、可及性和结局:来自华盛顿州心脏护理结局评估计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025607. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
3
Saving Money or Just Saving Lives? Improving the Productivity of US Health Care Spending.省钱还是拯救生命?提高美国医疗保健支出的生产率。
Annu Rev Econom. 2012 Sep;4:33-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110942. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
4
Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?急性护理区域化系统的概念综述:区域化是脓毒症护理的下一个前沿领域吗?
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12631. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12631. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Certificate-of-Need Programs Are Associated with a Reduced Incidence, Expenditure, and Rate of Complications with Respect to Knee Arthroscopy in the Medicare Population.需求证明计划与医疗保险人群膝关节镜检查的发病率、支出和并发症发生率降低相关。
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):264-271. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09693-z. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Models for Heart Failure Admissions and Admission Rates, 2016 through 2018.2016年至2018年心力衰竭入院及入院率模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 27;9(1):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010022.
7
Association of State Certificate of Need Regulation With Procedural Volume, Market Share, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.州需求监管证书与医疗保险受益人的程序量、市场份额和结果的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2058-2068. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21115.
8
Certificate of need laws: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.需求必要性证明法:系统综述和成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05563-1.
9
Impact of Global Budget Revenue Policy on Emergency Department Efficiency in the State of Maryland.马里兰州全球预算收入政策对急诊科效率的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 14;20(6):885-892. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.8.43201.
10
Entry regulation and the effect of public reporting: Evidence from Home Health Compare.入院规定和公开报告的效果:来自家庭健康比较的证据。
Health Econ. 2019 Apr;28(4):492-516. doi: 10.1002/hec.3859. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.心脏需求证明法规以及血运重建服务的可及性与使用情况。
Am Heart J. 2007 Oct;154(4):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.031.
2
Estimating cost savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures using hospital discharge data.利用医院出院数据估算心脏手术区域化带来的成本节约。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007 Jun 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-7.
3
Does certificate of need affect cardiac outcomes and costs?需求证明会影响心脏疾病的治疗结果和成本吗?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2006 Dec;6(4):300-24. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9008-9. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
4
Contemporary impact of state certificate-of-need regulations for cardiac surgery: an analysis using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Surgery Database.心脏手术州需求证书法规的当代影响:一项使用胸外科医师协会国家心脏手术数据库的分析
Circulation. 2006 Nov 14;114(20):2122-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591214. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
5
Comparison of three measurements of cardiac surgery mortality for the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.新英格兰北部心血管疾病研究组心脏手术死亡率三种测量方法的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Apr;81(4):1393-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.11.051.
6
Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation.在有和没有需求证明监管的州,医疗保险受益人群体在冠状动脉搭桥手术后的死亡率。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1859-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1859.
7
Learning and the evolution of medical technologies: the diffusion of coronary angioplasty.医学技术的学习与演进:冠状动脉血管成形术的传播
J Health Econ. 2002 Sep;21(5):873-85. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00057-7.
8
The relation between managed care market share and the treatment of elderly fee-for-service patients with myocardial infarction.管理式医疗市场份额与老年按服务收费心肌梗死患者治疗之间的关系。
Am J Med. 2002 Feb 15;112(3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01098-1.
9
Certificate of need and the quality of cardiac surgery.需求证明与心脏手术质量。
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):155-60. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600502.
10
Comparing mortality and time until death for medicare HMO and FFS beneficiaries.比较医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)和按服务收费(FFS)受益人的死亡率及死亡时间。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Feb;35(6):1245-65.