• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用医院出院数据估算心脏手术区域化带来的成本节约。

Estimating cost savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures using hospital discharge data.

作者信息

Ho Vivian, Petersen Laura A

机构信息

Baker Institute, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007 Jun 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-7.

DOI:10.1186/1478-7547-5-7
PMID:17603890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1919355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined whether higher procedure volumes for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were associated with lower costs per patient, and if so, estimated the financial savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures.

METHODS

Cost regressions with hospital-specific dummy variables measured within-hospital cost reductions associated with increasing hospital volume. We used the regression estimates to predict the change in total costs that would result from moving patients in low-volume hospitals to higher volume facilities.

RESULTS

A 10% increase in PCI procedure volume lowered costs per patient by 0.7%. For the average hospital performing CABG in 2000, a 10% increase in volume was associated with a 2.8% reduction in average costs. Despite these lower costs, the predicted savings from regionalizing all PCI procedures in the sample from lower to high-volume hospitals amounted to only 1.1% of the entire costs of performing PCI procedures for the sample in 2000. Similarly, the cost savings for CABG were estimated to be only 3.5%.

CONCLUSION

Higher volumes were associated with lower costs per procedure. However, the total potential savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures is relatively minor, and may not justify the risks of reducing access to needed services.

摘要

背景

我们研究了冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的手术量增加是否与每位患者的成本降低相关,如果是这样,则估计了将心脏手术区域化带来的财务节省。

方法

采用带有医院特定虚拟变量的成本回归来衡量与医院手术量增加相关的院内成本降低情况。我们使用回归估计来预测将低手术量医院的患者转移到高手术量医院所导致的总成本变化。

结果

PCI手术量增加10%可使每位患者的成本降低0.7%。对于2000年进行CABG的平均医院而言,手术量增加10%与平均成本降低2.8%相关。尽管成本降低了,但将样本中所有PCI手术从低手术量医院转移到高手术量医院所预测的节省仅占2000年样本中PCI手术总成本的1.1%。同样,CABG的成本节省估计仅为3.5%。

结论

手术量增加与每个手术的成本降低相关。然而,将心脏手术区域化带来的潜在总节省相对较小,可能不足以证明减少获得所需服务的风险是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b3/1919355/e6d51910db6c/1478-7547-5-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b3/1919355/e6d51910db6c/1478-7547-5-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40b3/1919355/e6d51910db6c/1478-7547-5-7-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating cost savings from regionalizing cardiac procedures using hospital discharge data.利用医院出院数据估算心脏手术区域化带来的成本节约。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007 Jun 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-7.
2
Comparison of Accessibility, Cost, and Quality of Elective Coronary Revascularization Between Veterans Affairs and Community Care Hospitals.退伍军人事务部和社区护理医院选择性冠状动脉血运重建的可及性、成本和质量比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):133-141. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4843.
3
Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.经桡动脉入路经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis.美国心血管手术基于容量的转诊:一项横断面回归分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun 3;5:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-42.
6
Potential shift from coronary bypass surgery to percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease and its economic impact in the drug-eluting stent era.在药物洗脱支架时代,多支血管病变患者从冠状动脉搭桥手术向经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的潜在转变及其经济影响。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Dec;23(14):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70885-1.
7
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery.在没有现场冠状动脉旁路移植手术和有现场冠状动脉旁路移植手术的中心进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
JAMA. 2004 Oct 27;292(16):1961-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.16.1961.
10
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.从荷兰视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术的成本效益
Heart. 2015 Dec;101(24):1980-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307578. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Centralization of Cancer Surgery Improve Social Welfare?癌症手术集中化能否改善社会福利?
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2012 Oct 16;15(2):1-25. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2012-0016.
2
Can postoperative process of care utilization or complication rates explain the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery?术后护理利用过程或并发症发生率能否解释癌症手术的量-成本关系?
Surgery. 2017 Aug;162(2):418-428. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
How Well Do All Patient Refined-Diagnosis-Related Groups Explain Costs of Pediatric Cancer Chemotherapy Admissions in the United States?

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
2
Regionalization of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and implications for patient travel distance.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的区域化及其对患者就诊距离的影响。
JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1717-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1717.
3
ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery).
所有患者精细化诊断相关组对美国儿童癌症化疗住院费用的解释程度如何?
J Oncol Pract. 2016 May;12(5):e564-75. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.010330. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Impact of processes of care aimed at complication reduction on the cost of complex cancer surgery.旨在降低并发症的护理流程对复杂癌症手术成本的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):610-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24053. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
5
The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery.并发症对复杂癌症手术成本的影响。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28527. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model.通过混合整数规划模型优化质量、可及性和效率来构建医院基础设施模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 16;13:220. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-220.
7
Case volume, quality of care, and care efficiency in coronary artery bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术的病例数量、护理质量和护理效率
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 26;170(14):1202-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.237.
8
Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?正反方辩论:区域集中化危重病治疗的益处是否超过了患者在机构间转运的风险?
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):219. doi: 10.1186/cc7883. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
9
Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.心脏护理需求证书(CON):关于需求证书贡献的争议。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):483-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00933.x. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉搭桥手术2004年指南更新:综述文章:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(更新1999年冠状动脉搭桥手术指南委员会)报告
Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1168-76. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138790.14877.7D.
4
New evidence on hospital profitability by payer group and the effects of payer generosity.按支付方分组的医院盈利能力新证据及支付方慷慨程度的影响。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Sep;4(3):231-46. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000036048.26098.9d.
5
Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums?1998年至2000年医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量与患者死亡率:现有证据是否支持当前的手术量下限?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 19;43(10):1755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.070.
6
Regionalization and the underuse of angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as compared with a fee-for-service system.与按服务收费系统相比,退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中的区域化及血管造影术使用不足的情况。
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2209-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021725.
7
Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state.技术发展与医疗生产力:血管成形术在纽约州的推广
J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):187-217. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00125-X.
8
Does competition under Medicare Prospective Payment selectively reduce expenditures on high-cost patients?医疗保险预期支付制度下的竞争是否会有选择地减少高成本患者的支出?
Rand J Econ. 2002 Autumn;33(3):447-68.
9
Will volume-based referral strategies reduce costs or just save lives?基于数量的转诊策略能降低成本还是仅仅挽救生命?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):234-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.234.
10
Volume and outcome--it is time to move ahead.容量与预后——是时候向前迈进了。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1161-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200204113461512.