• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院规定和公开报告的效果:来自家庭健康比较的证据。

Entry regulation and the effect of public reporting: Evidence from Home Health Compare.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Department of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2019 Apr;28(4):492-516. doi: 10.1002/hec.3859. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1002/hec.3859
PMID:30689246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405307/
Abstract

Economic theory suggests that competition and information are complementary tools for promoting health care quality. The existing empirical literature has documented this effect only in the context of competition among existing firms. Extending this literature, we examine competition driven by the entry of new firms into the home health care industry. In particular, we use the certificate of need (CON) law as a proxy for the entry of firms to avoid potential endogeneity of entry. We find that home health agencies in non-CON states improved quality under public reporting significantly more than agencies in CON states. Because home health care is a labor-intensive and capital-light industry, the state CON law is a major barrier for new firms to enter. Our findings suggest that policymakers may jointly consider information disclosure and entry regulation to achieve better quality in home health care.

摘要

经济理论表明,竞争和信息是促进医疗质量的互补工具。现有实证文献仅在现有企业竞争的背景下记录了这一效应。在扩展这一文献的过程中,我们考察了新企业进入家庭保健行业所带来的竞争。具体来说,我们使用需求证明(CON)法作为企业进入的代理,以避免进入的潜在内生性。我们发现,在公共报告制度下,非 CON 州的家庭保健机构在提高质量方面的表现明显优于 CON 州的机构。由于家庭保健是一个劳动密集型和资本轻量级的行业,州 CON 法是新企业进入的主要障碍。我们的研究结果表明,政策制定者可能会共同考虑信息披露和进入监管,以实现家庭保健服务质量的提高。

相似文献

1
Entry regulation and the effect of public reporting: Evidence from Home Health Compare.入院规定和公开报告的效果:来自家庭健康比较的证据。
Health Econ. 2019 Apr;28(4):492-516. doi: 10.1002/hec.3859. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
2
Certificate of need and the cost of competition in home healthcare markets.医疗需求证明与家庭医疗市场竞争成本。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2020 Apr-Jun;39(2):51-64. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2020.1728464. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Competition and quality in home health care markets.家庭医疗保健市场中的竞争与质量
Health Econ. 2014 Mar;23(3):298-313. doi: 10.1002/hec.2938. Epub 2013 May 14.
4
Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.信息是否重要?竞争、质量与养老院评分报告的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1698-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01298.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
5
The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.需求证明法对疗养院和家庭医疗保健支出的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Feb;73(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1077558715597161. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Does certificate of need law enhance competition in inpatient care market? An empirical analysis.需要证法是否增强了住院医疗市场的竞争?一项实证分析。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Jul;14(3):400-420. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000184. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
Association Between States' Certificate of Need Laws and Home Health Care Access in the US.美国各州需求证明法与家庭保健服务可及性的关联
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Jun;43(6):670-677. doi: 10.1177/07334648231218079. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Market competition and quality of care in the nursing home industry.养老院行业的市场竞争与护理质量
J Health Care Finance. 2005 Fall;32(1):67-81.
9
Certificate-of-need deregulation and indigent hospital care.需求证明书管制放松与贫困人群医院护理
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):905-25. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-4-905.
10
Issues and opportunities in the regulation of home health care.家庭医疗保健监管中的问题与机遇。
Health Policy Educ. 1980 Oct;1(3):237-53. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2281(80)80003-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology regulation reconsidered: The effects of certificate of need policies on the quantity and quality of diagnostic imaging.重新审视技术监管:需求证明政策对诊断成像数量和质量的影响。
J Health Econ. 2025 Aug;102:103020. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103020. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
2
The impact of hospital price and quality transparency tools on healthcare spending: a systematic review.医院价格与质量透明度工具对医疗支出的影响:一项系统综述
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Dec 14;12(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00409-4.
3
The impact of price transparency and competition on hospital costs: a research on all-payer claims databases.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality rating and private-prices: Evidence from the nursing home industry.质量评级与私人价格:来自疗养院行业的证据。
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
2
The Impact of Nursing Home Pay-for-Performance on Quality and Medicare Spending: Results from the Nursing Home Value-Based Purchasing Demonstration.养老院绩效薪酬对质量和医疗保险支出的影响:养老院基于价值的采购示范项目的结果
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1387-1408. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12538. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Competition, information, and quality: Evidence from nursing homes.
价格透明度和竞争对医院成本的影响:基于所有支付者索赔数据库的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):1321. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08711-x.
4
The Impact of Public Reporting Schemes and Market Competition on Hospital Efficiency.公共报告计划和市场竞争对医院效率的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;9(8):1031. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081031.
竞争、信息与质量:来自养老院的证据
J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;49:136-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
4
The Effect of Publicized Quality Information on Home Health Agency Choice.公开的质量信息对家庭健康机构选择的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Dec;73(6):703-723. doi: 10.1177/1077558715623718. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Practice patterns among entrants and incumbents in the home health market after the prospective payment system was implemented.前瞻性支付系统实施后家庭健康市场新进入者和现有从业者的执业模式。
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:118-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.3147.
6
The Effect of Entry Regulation in the Health Care Sector: the Case of Home Health.医疗保健行业准入监管的影响:以家庭健康护理为例。
J Public Econ. 2014 Feb 1;110:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.003.
7
Competition and the impact of online hospital report cards.竞争与在线医院报告卡的影响。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34:42-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
Competition and quality in home health care markets.家庭医疗保健市场中的竞争与质量
Health Econ. 2014 Mar;23(3):298-313. doi: 10.1002/hec.2938. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Quality outcomes among efficient and inefficient nursing homes: a national study.高效和低效养老院的质量结果:一项全国性研究。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Apr-Jun;38(2):156-65. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31824bec38.
10
Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.信息是否重要?竞争、质量与养老院评分报告的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1698-719. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01298.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.