• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苍白球刺激治疗颈部肌张力障碍:刺激参数急性变化的临床意义

Pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: clinical implications of acute changes in stimulation parameters.

作者信息

Moro E, Piboolnurak P, Arenovich T, Hung S W, Poon Y-Y, Lozano A M

机构信息

Movement Disorders Center, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2009 Apr;16(4):506-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02520.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02520.x
PMID:19207733
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is successful in dystonia, but the role of each electrical parameters of stimulation is unclear. We studied the clinical effects of acute changes of different parameters of GPi-DBS in cervical dystonia (CD).

METHODS

Eight CD patients with bilateral GPi-DBS at 28.6 +/- 19.2 (mean +/- SD) months after surgery were recruited. Mean improvement in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity score was 54.5% compared to before surgery. Ten settings, including a combination of a wide range of pulse widths (PWs), low and high frequencies and voltage, were administered in a randomized double blinded fashion. Clinical benefit was assessed by two raters using the TWSTRS and by the patients using an analogue rating scale.

RESULTS

The TWSTRS severity scores were reduced by 56.7% with stimulation at the best settings. Improvement was significantly associated with high frequency (> or = 60 Hz) and high voltage. Stimulation at 130 Hz showed the best clinical improvement. Increasing PWs (from 60 to 450 micros) did not result in a significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Frequency and amplitude appear to be the most important factors in the acute anti-dystonic effects in GPi-DBS patients with CD.

摘要

背景与目的

内侧苍白球(GPi)的深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗肌张力障碍取得成功,但刺激的各项电参数所起的作用尚不清楚。我们研究了GPi-DBS不同参数的急性变化对颈部肌张力障碍(CD)的临床效果。

方法

招募了8例术后28.6±19.2(平均±标准差)个月接受双侧GPi-DBS治疗的CD患者。与手术前相比,多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)严重程度评分的平均改善率为54.5%。以随机双盲方式给予10种设置,包括多种脉冲宽度(PW)、低频和高频以及电压的组合。由两名评估者使用TWSTRS进行临床获益评估,并由患者使用模拟评分量表进行评估。

结果

在最佳设置下进行刺激时,TWSTRS严重程度评分降低了56.7%。改善与高频(≥60Hz)和高电压显著相关。130Hz的刺激显示出最佳的临床改善效果。增加PW(从60微秒至450微秒)并未带来显著改善。

结论

频率和幅度似乎是GPi-DBS治疗CD患者急性抗肌张力障碍效应中最重要的因素。

相似文献

1
Pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: clinical implications of acute changes in stimulation parameters.苍白球刺激治疗颈部肌张力障碍:刺激参数急性变化的临床意义
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Apr;16(4):506-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02520.x.
2
A randomized double-blind crossover trial comparing subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia.一项比较丘脑底核和苍白球深部脑刺激治疗肌张力障碍的随机双盲交叉试验。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1537-45. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13844. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
Effects of relative low-frequency bilateral globus pallidus internus stimulation for treatment of cervical dystonia.相对低频双侧苍白球内侧部刺激治疗颈部肌张力障碍的效果
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(1):30-6. doi: 10.1159/000333839. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
4
Long-term outcome of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary cervical dystonia.双侧苍白球深部脑刺激治疗原发性颈部肌张力障碍的长期疗效
Neurology. 2007 Feb 6;68(6):457-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252932.71306.89.
5
Predictive factors of outcome in primary cervical dystonia following pallidal deep brain stimulation.苍白球深部脑刺激治疗原发性颈肌张力障碍的疗效预测因素。
Mov Disord. 2013 Sep;28(10):1451-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.25560. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
6
Good long-term efficacy of pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: a prospective, observer-blinded study.苍白球刺激治疗颈肌张力障碍的长期疗效良好:一项前瞻性、观察者盲法研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Apr;19(4):610-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03591.x. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in primary cervical dystonia.丘脑底核脑深部电刺激治疗原发性颈肌张力障碍。
Neurology. 2011 Mar 8;76(10):870-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820f2e4f.
8
The Canadian multicentre study of deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia.加拿大深部脑刺激治疗颈部肌张力障碍多中心研究。
Brain. 2007 Nov;130(Pt 11):2879-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm229. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
9
Pallidal stimulation for cervical dystonia does not correct abnormal temporal discrimination.苍白球刺激治疗颈肌张力障碍并不能纠正异常的时间辨别能力。
Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1874-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.25581. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
Bilateral deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia in patients with previous peripheral surgery.双侧深部脑刺激治疗既往外周手术的颈部肌张力障碍。
Mov Disord. 2012 Feb;27(2):301-4. doi: 10.1002/mds.24022. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep brain stimulation for dystonia treatment in cerebral palsy: efficacy exploration.脑深部刺激术治疗脑瘫所致肌张力障碍:疗效探索
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2025 Jun 9;250:10330. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2025.10330. eCollection 2025.
2
Does Pallidal Physiology Determine the Success of Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia?苍白球生理学是否决定了单侧脑深部电刺激治疗颈肌张力障碍的效果?
Adv Neurobiol. 2023;31:211-221. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26220-3_12.
3
Adjuvant medical therapy in cervical dystonia after deep brain stimulation: A retrospective analysis.
脑深部电刺激术后颈部肌张力障碍的辅助药物治疗:一项回顾性分析。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 5;13:927573. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.927573. eCollection 2022.
4
Neuromodulation for Trigeminal Neuralgia.三叉神经痛的神经调节治疗
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Sep;65(5):640-651. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0004. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches.脑深部电刺激的过去、现在与未来:硬件、软件、成像、生理学及新方法
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 9;13:825178. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.825178. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-Term Follow-Up of 12 Patients Treated with Bilateral Pallidal Stimulation for Tardive Dystonia.12例迟发性肌张力障碍患者接受双侧苍白球刺激术的长期随访
Life (Basel). 2021 May 24;11(6):477. doi: 10.3390/life11060477.
7
Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome.苍白球深部脑刺激治疗单基因肌张力障碍:基因对治疗结果的影响。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 8;11:630391. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.630391. eCollection 2020.
8
A pooled meta-analysis of GPi and STN deep brain stimulation outcomes for cervical dystonia.针对颈肌张力障碍的 GPi 和 STN 脑深部电刺激治疗的汇总荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2020 May;267(5):1278-1290. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09703-9. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies.用于运动障碍的脑深部电刺激编程:当前概念与循证策略
Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:410. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00410. eCollection 2019.
10
Deep brain stimulation for dystonia.用于治疗肌张力障碍的深部脑刺激术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 10;1(1):CD012405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012405.pub2.