Suppr超能文献

初级医疗实践中乳腺癌风险的基因评估。

Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.

作者信息

Burke Wylie, Culver Julie, Pinsky Linda, Hall Sarah, Reynolds Susan E, Yasui Yutaka, Press Nancy

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7120, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Mar;149A(3):349-56. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32643.

Abstract

Family history is increasingly important in primary care as a means to detect candidates for genetic testing or tailored prevention programs. We evaluated primary care physicians' skills in assessing family history for breast cancer risk, using unannounced standardized patient (SP) visits to 86 general internists and family medicine practitioners in King County, WA. Transcripts of clinical encounters were coded to determine ascertainment of family history, risk assessment, and clinical follow-up. Physicians in our study collected sufficient family history to assess breast cancer risk in 48% of encounters with an anxious patient at moderate risk, 100% of encounters with a patient who had a strong maternal family history of breast cancer, and 45% of encounters with a patient who had a strong paternal family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Increased risk was usually communicated in terms of recommendations for preventive action. Few physicians referred patients to genetic counseling, few associated ovarian cancer with breast cancer risk, and some incorrectly discounted paternal family history of breast cancer. We conclude that pedigree assessment of breast cancer risk is feasible in primary care, but may occur consistently only when a strong maternal family history is present. Primary care education should focus on the link between inherited breast and ovarian cancer risk and on the significance of paternal family history. Educational efforts may be most successful when they emphasize the value of genetic counseling for individuals at risk for inherited cancer and the connection between genetic risk and specific prevention measures.

摘要

家族史在初级保健中作为检测基因检测候选者或量身定制预防方案的一种手段正变得越来越重要。我们通过对华盛顿州金县86名普通内科医生和家庭医生进行未事先通知的标准化患者(SP)访视,评估了初级保健医生评估乳腺癌风险家族史的技能。对临床诊疗记录进行编码,以确定家族史的确定情况、风险评估和临床随访情况。在我们的研究中,医生在48%与中度风险焦虑患者的诊疗中、100%与有强烈乳腺癌母系家族史患者的诊疗中以及45%与有强烈乳腺癌和卵巢癌父系家族史患者的诊疗中,收集了足够的家族史来评估乳腺癌风险。增加的风险通常以预防行动建议的形式传达。很少有医生将患者转介进行遗传咨询,很少有人将卵巢癌与乳腺癌风险联系起来,还有一些人错误地忽视了父系家族的乳腺癌病史。我们得出结论,在初级保健中对乳腺癌风险进行系谱评估是可行的,但可能只有在存在强烈的母系家族史时才会持续进行。初级保健教育应侧重于遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险之间的联系以及父系家族史的重要性。当强调对遗传性癌症风险个体进行遗传咨询的价值以及遗传风险与特定预防措施之间的联系时,教育努力可能最为成功。

相似文献

1
Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Mar;149A(3):349-56. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32643.
2
Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient's risk?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Apr;19(4):302-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30280.x.
6
Can breast surgeons provide breast cancer genetic testing? An American Society of Breast Surgeons survey.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4104-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3711-9. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
7
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):957-966. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a106d4.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
Physicians' experience, practice and education, on genetic testing and genetic counseling: a nationwide survey study in Greece.
Fam Cancer. 2022 Oct;21(4):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00290-4. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Pilot study of a culturally sensitive intervention to promote genetic counseling for breast cancer risk.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08193-x.
3
Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221104666. doi: 10.1177/10732748221104666.
4
Care of men with cancer-predisposing variants.
BMJ. 2021 Oct 14;375:n2376. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2376.
6
Factors Influencing Discussion of Cancer Genetic Testing with Health-Care Providers in a Population-Based Survey.
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(3-4):160-170. doi: 10.1159/000515465. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
A feasibility study of breast cancer genetic risk assessment in a federally qualified health center.
Cancer. 2018 Sep 15;124(18):3733-3741. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31635. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4.
10
Referral to cancer genetic counseling: do migrant status and patients' educational background matter?
J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0326-4. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.
Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
2
Primary care visit length, quality, and satisfaction for standardized patients with depression.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1641-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0371-5. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
3
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75.
4
Cancer risk assessment: examining the family physician's role.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):468-77. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468.
5
Paternal relatives and family history of breast cancer.
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.05.002.
6
Physicians' responses to patients' medically unexplained symptoms.
Psychosom Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;68(2):269-76. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000204652.27246.5b.
7
Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):863-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6772.
9
Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 6;143(5):355-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验