Dearborn Jennifer L, McCullough Louise D
Department of Neurology, The University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-1840, USA.
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543272. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
Women face a higher mortality after stroke and have different risk factors than men. Despite educational campaigns, women continue to underestimate their own risk for stroke. We present a theoretical model to understand risk perception in high-risk women.
Eight hundred five women, ages 50 to 70 years, were selected from the University of Connecticut Cardiology Center with at least one risk factor for stroke. A 5-part questionnaire addressed stroke knowledge, risk perception, risk factors, access to health care, and demographics. Two hundred fifteen women responded by mail (28% response rate) and deidentified data were entered in SPSS. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate techniques assessed the proposed model.
The cohort was predominantly white (91.5%), higher income (33.1% of the population earned >$75,000), and well-educated (28.6% attended graduate or professional school). Only 2 of the 37 (5.4%) women with atrial fibrillation and 11 of the 71 women with heart disease (15.5%) identified their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. Predictors of risk perception included: other women's risk (B=0.336, P<0.001), worrying about stroke (B=0.734, P<0.001), having hypertension (B=0.686, P=0.037), and having diabetes (B=0.893, P=0.004). Only 63.9% of women with atrial fibrillation (n=23) reported taking warfarin.
Women were often unable to identify their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. In addition, many women were not undertaking primary prevention behaviors. Risk perception was low, and high-risk women perceived their risk of stroke to be the same as their peers. Educational strategies must advocate for and target high-risk women.
女性中风后的死亡率更高,且与男性有着不同的风险因素。尽管开展了教育活动,但女性仍继续低估自身的中风风险。我们提出一个理论模型来理解高危女性的风险认知。
从康涅狄格大学心脏病中心选取了805名年龄在50至70岁之间、至少有一项中风风险因素的女性。一份包含五个部分的问卷涉及中风知识、风险认知、风险因素、医疗保健获取情况及人口统计学信息。215名女性通过邮件回复(回复率为28%),经过身份去识别处理的数据被录入SPSS。采用描述性、双变量和多变量技术对所提出的模型进行评估。
该队列主要为白人(91.5%)、高收入人群(33.1%的人口收入超过75,000美元)且受教育程度较高(28.6%上过研究生或专业学校)。37名患有心房颤动的女性中只有2名(5.4%)、71名患有心脏病的女性中只有11名(15.5%)将自己的健康状况视为中风的风险因素。风险认知的预测因素包括:其他女性的风险(B = 0.336,P < 0.001)、担心中风(B = 0.734,P < 0.001)、患有高血压(B = 0.686,P = 0.037)以及患有糖尿病(B = 0.893,P = 0.004)。只有63.9%患有心房颤动的女性(n = 23)报告服用了华法林。
女性往往无法将自己的健康状况识别为中风的风险因素。此外,许多女性未采取一级预防行为。风险认知较低,高危女性认为自己的中风风险与同龄人相同。教育策略必须针对高危女性并向她们宣传。