Ashley Kevin, Applegate Gregory T, Marcy A Dale, Drake Pamela L, Pierce Paul A, Carabin Nathalie, Demange Martine
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Mail Stop R-7, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998, USA.
J Environ Monit. 2009 Feb;11(2):318-25. doi: 10.1039/b812236a. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
Because toxicities may differ for Cr(VI) compounds of varying solubility, some countries and organizations have promulgated different occupational exposure limits (OELs) for soluble and insoluble hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) compounds, and analytical methods are needed to determine these species in workplace air samples. To address this need, international standard methods ASTM D6832 and ISO 16740 have been published that describe sequential extraction techniques for soluble and insoluble Cr(VI) in samples collected from occupational settings. However, no published performance data were previously available for these Cr(VI) sequential extraction procedures. In this work, the sequential extraction methods outlined in the relevant international standards were investigated. The procedures tested involved the use of either deionized water or an ammonium sulfate/ammonium hydroxide buffer solution to target soluble Cr(VI) species. This was followed by extraction in a sodium carbonate/sodium hydroxide buffer solution to dissolve insoluble Cr(VI) compounds. Three-step sequential extraction with (1) water, (2) sulfate buffer and (3) carbonate buffer was also investigated. Sequential extractions were carried out on spiked samples of soluble, sparingly soluble and insoluble Cr(VI) compounds, and analyses were then generally carried out by using the diphenylcarbazide method. Similar experiments were performed on paint pigment samples and on airborne particulate filter samples collected from stainless steel welding. Potential interferences from soluble and insoluble Cr(III) compounds, as well as from Fe(II), were investigated. Interferences from Cr(III) species were generally absent, while the presence of Fe(II) resulted in low Cr(VI) recoveries. Two-step sequential extraction of spiked samples with (first) either water or sulfate buffer, and then carbonate buffer, yielded quantitative recoveries of soluble Cr(VI) and insoluble Cr(VI), respectively. Three-step sequential extraction gave excessively high recoveries of soluble Cr(VI), low recoveries of sparingly soluble Cr(VI), and quantitative recoveries of insoluble Cr(VI). Experiments on paint pigment samples using two-step extraction with water and carbonate buffer yielded varying percentages of relative fractions of soluble and insoluble Cr(VI). Sequential extractions of stainless steel welding fume air filter samples demonstrated the predominance of soluble Cr(VI) compounds in such samples. The performance data obtained in this work support the Cr(VI) sequential extraction procedures described in the international standards.
由于不同溶解度的六价铬(Cr(VI))化合物的毒性可能不同,一些国家和组织针对可溶性和不溶性六价铬(Cr(VI))化合物颁布了不同的职业接触限值(OELs),因此需要分析方法来测定工作场所空气样品中的这些物质。为满足这一需求,已发布了国际标准方法ASTM D6832和ISO 16740,它们描述了从职业环境中采集的样品中可溶性和不溶性Cr(VI)的连续萃取技术。然而,此前尚无这些Cr(VI)连续萃取程序已发表的性能数据。在本研究中,对相关国际标准中概述的连续萃取方法进行了研究。所测试的程序涉及使用去离子水或硫酸铵/氢氧化铵缓冲溶液来靶向可溶性Cr(VI)物质。随后在碳酸钠/氢氧化钠缓冲溶液中进行萃取,以溶解不溶性Cr(VI)化合物。还研究了用(1)水、(2)硫酸盐缓冲液和(3)碳酸盐缓冲液进行的三步连续萃取。对可溶性、微溶性和不溶性Cr(VI)化合物的加标样品进行连续萃取,然后通常使用二苯卡巴肼法进行分析。对涂料颜料样品以及从不锈钢焊接中采集的空气颗粒物过滤样品进行了类似实验。研究了可溶性和不溶性Cr(III)化合物以及Fe(II)的潜在干扰。Cr(III)物质通常不存在干扰,而Fe(II)的存在导致Cr(VI)回收率较低。对加标样品先用(第一步)水或硫酸盐缓冲液,然后用碳酸盐缓冲液进行两步连续萃取,分别得到了可溶性Cr(VI)和不溶性Cr(VI)的定量回收率。三步连续萃取得到的可溶性Cr(VI)回收率过高,微溶性Cr(VI)回收率较低,不溶性Cr(VI)回收率为定量。使用水和碳酸盐缓冲液对涂料颜料样品进行两步萃取的实验得到了可溶性和不溶性Cr(VI)相对含量的不同百分比。对不锈钢焊接烟尘空气过滤样品的连续萃取表明,此类样品中可溶性Cr(VI)化合物占主导地位。本研究中获得的性能数据支持国际标准中描述的Cr(VI)连续萃取程序。