• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医学专业课程中的教师绩效评估。一种工具的验证]

[Teacher's performance evaluation in medical specialties courses. An instrument validation].

作者信息

Martínez-González Adrián, Lifshitz-Guinzberg Alberto, Ponce-Rosas Raúl, Aguilar Víctor

机构信息

Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Instituro Mexicano del Seguro Social.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2008 Jul-Aug;46(4):375-82.

PMID:19213208
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

our purpose was to validate an instrument to assess the academic performance in medical specialization courses.

METHODS

the design and content validity of the questionnaire had sustained in the literature review, as well as in the opinion had been given by experts and residents. The construct validity was measure for exploratory factorial analysis, only questions with factor charge > or = 0.50 and that classified as a single factor has been retained and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated.

RESULTS

residents (157) evaluated to 9 professors. The answer rate was of 75.1%. The questionnaire has 37 items. Five factors were identified with eigen values > or =1 which explained 52.5% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was of 0.9596 for the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

the instrument has a high grade of reliability and it can be used for evaluation and pursuit of the academic performance in medical specialities courses.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是验证一种用于评估医学专科课程学业成绩的工具。

方法

问卷的设计和内容效度在文献综述以及专家和住院医师的意见中得到了支持。通过探索性因子分析来衡量结构效度,仅保留因子载荷>或 = 0.50 且归类为单一因子的问题,并计算克朗巴哈α系数。

结果

157 名住院医师对 9 名教授进行了评估。答复率为 75.1%。问卷有 37 个项目。确定了五个特征值>或 =1 的因子,它们解释了总方差的 52.5%。该问卷的克朗巴哈α系数为 0.9596。

结论

该工具具有高度可靠性,可用于评估和追踪医学专科课程的学业成绩。

相似文献

1
[Teacher's performance evaluation in medical specialties courses. An instrument validation].[医学专业课程中的教师绩效评估。一种工具的验证]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2008 Jul-Aug;46(4):375-82.
2
Development and psychometric characteristics of a new domain of the stanford faculty development program instrument.斯坦福教师发展项目工具新领域的开发及心理测量学特征
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Winter;34(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.21213.
3
[Teacher's perfomance assessment in Family Medicine specialization].[家庭医学专业教师绩效评估]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016 Sep-Oct;54(5):612-9.
4
[Construction, validation and use of an instrument developed to assess learning clinical environments in medical specialties].[一种用于评估医学专业临床学习环境的工具的构建、验证与应用]
Gac Med Mex. 2013 Jul-Aug;149(4):394-405.
5
[Development of MEDUC-PG14 survey to assess postgraduate teaching in medical specialties].[用于评估医学专业研究生教学的MEDUC-PG14调查问卷的开发]
Rev Med Chil. 2015 Aug;143(8):1005-14. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872015000800007.
6
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
7
[Transcultural validation of the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire].《马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷调查表的跨文化验证》
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;117(4):e425-e432. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.e425.
8
Assessment of medical residents' satisfaction.住院医师满意度评估。
Cir Cir. 2011 Mar-Apr;79(2):156-67.
9
[Development and validation of an instrument to measure the satisfaction of users of rehabilitation services].[一种用于测量康复服务使用者满意度的工具的开发与验证]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2007 Nov-Dec;45(6):573-8.
10
[Teaching performance assessment in Public Health employing three different strategies].
Gac Med Mex. 2011 May-Jun;147(3):234-43.