• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Teaching performance assessment in Public Health employing three different strategies].

作者信息

Martínez-González Adrián, Moreno-Altamirano Laura, Ponce-Rosas Efrén Raúl, Martínez-Franco Adrián Israel, Urrutia-Aguilar María Esther

机构信息

Departamento de Salud Pública; Secretaría de Educación Médica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

出版信息

Gac Med Mex. 2011 May-Jun;147(3):234-43.

PMID:21743591
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The educational system depends upon the quality and performance of their faculty and should therefore be process of continuous improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the teaching performance of the Public Health professors, at the Faculty of Medicine, UNAM through three strategies.

METHODS

Justification study. The evaluation was conducted under a mediational model through three strategies: students' opinion assessment, self-assessment and students' academic achievement. We applied descriptive statistics, Student t test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Twenty professors were evaluated from the Public Health department, representing 57% of all them who teach the subject. The professor's performance was highly valued self-assessment compared with assessment of student opinion, was confirmed by statistical analysis the difference was significant. The difference amongst the three evaluation strategies became more evident between self-assessment and the scores obtained by students in their academic achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of these three strategies offers a more complete view of the teacher's performance quality. Academic achievement appears to be a more objective strategy for teaching performance assessment than students' opinion and self-assessment.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Teaching performance assessment in Public Health employing three different strategies].
Gac Med Mex. 2011 May-Jun;147(3):234-43.
2
Validating dental and medical students' evaluations of faculty teaching in an integrated, multi-instructor course.验证牙科和医学专业学生对综合多教师课程中教师教学的评价。
J Dent Educ. 2005 Jun;69(6):663-70.
3
[Academic performance among first year medical students at the School of Medicine, UNAM].[墨西哥国立自治大学医学院一年级医学生的学业成绩]
Gac Med Mex. 2007 Jan-Feb;143(1):27-32.
4
[Student evaluation of the professor's performance and its effects on teaching effectiveness].[学生对教授表现的评价及其对教学效果的影响]
Gac Med Mex. 1989 May-Jun;125(5-6):151-9; discussion 160.
5
Are anonymous evaluations a better assessment of faculty teaching performance? A comparative analysis of open and anonymous evaluation processes.匿名评估对教师教学表现的评估更好吗?公开评估与匿名评估流程的比较分析。
Fam Med. 2005 Jan;37(1):43-7.
6
Steps to improve the teaching of public health to undergraduate medical students in Canada.加拿大提高本科医学生公共卫生教学质量的步骤。
Acad Med. 2008 Apr;83(4):414-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318166a8e4.
7
The significance and impact of a faculty teaching award: disparate perceptions of department chairs and award recipients.教师教学奖的意义与影响:系主任与获奖者的不同看法
Med Teach. 2006 Nov;28(7):614-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590600878051.
8
Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology.医学生对妇产科住院医师和教员作为门诊妇科临床带教老师的教学质量评价
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.038. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
9
Examination of a clinical teaching effectiveness instrument used for summative faculty assessment.用于教师总结性评估的临床教学效果评估工具的检验。
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Dec;30(4):339-61. doi: 10.1177/0163278707307906.
10
[Teacher's perfomance assessment in Family Medicine specialization].[家庭医学专业教师绩效评估]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016 Sep-Oct;54(5):612-9.