Bassi Mahdi, Jarzem Peter F, Steibel Matthew, Barriga Peter, Ouellet Jean, Reindl Rudy
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):351-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819287d6.
In vitro study of the spinal cord tension and pressure relationships before and after thawing in 6 different spinal cord segment from 2 individual pigs.
To determine if frozen and thawed spinal cord segments had different tension/cord interstitial pressure(CIP) relationships to fresh spinal cord segments. In addition, we will determine if the cord level, individual cord properties, and repeated CIP measurements affect the tension/CIP relationships.
Spinal cord distraction is a known cause of spinal cord injury. Several articles published on the pathophysiology of the cord distraction injury suggest that the underlying mechanism of injury is a microvascular ischemic event. We have previously described an increase in CIP with spinal cord distraction, pressures average 23 mmHg at 1 kg loads.
Six cord segments harvested from 2 pigs contained cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments, and underwent distraction using a series of 7 calibrated weights from 0 to 1000 g weight. The cords were measured at each level of distraction. The cords were then frozen at -20 degrees C for a period of 2 weeks, and then thawed and retested. Multiple linear regression was then performed.
There was no difference between the fresh and the frozen-thawed cords; there was statistical difference between the 2 pigs (18 mmHg) (P < 0.001). There are differences between the cervical and the thoracic cord segments (P < 0.001), and between cervical and lumbar cord segments (P = 0.056). There is a significant relation between the tension applied and CIP. Repeated trials showed no drift with repeated measures.
Freezing and thawing spinal cords has no effect on the CIP/tension curves. Cord interstitial pressure developed is dependant on cord tension, cord level, individual cord properties, but not on the number of repetitions carried out while testing the spinal cord.
对来自2头猪的6个不同脊髓节段解冻前后的脊髓张力与压力关系进行体外研究。
确定冷冻和解冻后的脊髓节段与新鲜脊髓节段的张力/脊髓间质压力(CIP)关系是否不同。此外,我们将确定脊髓节段水平、个体脊髓特性以及重复的CIP测量是否会影响张力/CIP关系。
脊髓牵张是已知的脊髓损伤原因。几篇关于脊髓牵张损伤病理生理学的文章表明,损伤的潜在机制是微血管缺血事件。我们之前描述过脊髓牵张时CIP升高,在1千克负荷下压力平均为23毫米汞柱。
从2头猪身上获取6个包含颈段、胸段和腰段的脊髓节段,使用一系列从0到1000克的7个校准砝码进行牵张。在每个牵张水平对脊髓进行测量。然后将脊髓在-20℃冷冻2周,接着解冻并重新测试。随后进行多元线性回归分析。
新鲜脊髓与冷冻解冻后的脊髓之间无差异;2头猪之间存在统计学差异(18毫米汞柱)(P<0.001)。颈段和胸段脊髓节段之间存在差异(P<0.001),颈段和腰段脊髓节段之间存在差异(P = 0.056)。施加的张力与CIP之间存在显著关系。重复试验表明重复测量无漂移。
脊髓的冷冻和解冻对CIP/张力曲线无影响。产生的脊髓间质压力取决于脊髓张力、脊髓节段水平、个体脊髓特性,但不取决于测试脊髓时进行的重复次数。