Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1000 South Fremont Ave, Unit #80, Alhambra, CA 91803, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Jul;14(4):580-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0454-5.
To examine socio-demographic disparities associated with a quality medical home.
A nationally representative sample of children ages 0-17 years (n = 102,353) from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health. Risk factors including non-white race/ethnicity, income <200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), uninsured, parent education lesser than high school, and non-English primary household language, were examined in relation to a quality medical home separately and together as a "profile" of risk. Fourteen questions were used to measure five medical home features: access, continuity, comprehensiveness, family-centered care, and coordination. Quality was defined as a value greater than median for each feature and for an overall score.
Before and after adjustment for child demographics and health status, all studied risk factors were associated with poorer quality medical home features. Uninsured [odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.47] and low-income children (OR = 0.65, CI: 0.62-0.69) had among the lowest odds of a quality medical home overall and across most features, except coordination that showed an opposite trend. Summarized through risk profiles, children experiencing all five risk factors had 93% lower odds of a quality medical home overall (OR = 0.07, CI: 0.04-0.25) compared to zero risk children.
This study demonstrates large national disparities in the quality of a medical home for children. That disparities were most prevalent for the uninsured and those in or near poverty, both modifiable risk factors, suggests that reforms to increase coverage and to lift families out of poverty are essential to assuring that children have access to the full complement of appropriate health care services including a quality medical home.
研究与优质医疗之家相关的社会人口学差异。
采用全国代表性的 0-17 岁儿童样本(n=102353),来自 2003 年全国儿童健康调查。风险因素包括非白种人种族/民族、收入低于联邦贫困线(FPL)的 200%、没有保险、父母教育程度低于高中、家庭主要语言不是英语,这些因素分别与优质医疗之家进行了检查,并作为一个“风险概况”进行了综合检查。使用 14 个问题来衡量医疗之家的五个特征:可及性、连续性、全面性、以家庭为中心的护理和协调性。质量定义为每个特征和整体得分大于中位数的值。
在调整儿童人口统计学和健康状况后,所有研究的风险因素都与较差的医疗之家质量特征相关。未保险[比值比(OR)=0.43,95%置信区间(CI):0.40-0.47]和低收入儿童(OR=0.65,CI:0.62-0.69)的整体和大多数特征的优质医疗之家机会最低,除了协调,呈现相反的趋势。通过风险概况总结,经历所有五个风险因素的儿童整体获得优质医疗之家的机会降低了 93%(OR=0.07,CI:0.04-0.25),而零风险儿童则没有。
这项研究表明,儿童优质医疗之家存在很大的全国性差异。对于无保险和处于或接近贫困的儿童,差异最为普遍,这两个都是可改变的风险因素,这表明扩大覆盖面和帮助家庭脱贫的改革对于确保儿童获得完整的适当医疗保健服务,包括优质医疗之家,是至关重要的。