Bleser William K, Young Sara I, Miranda Patricia Y
Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Patient- and family-centered care (PFCC), which recognizes the family as an integral partner in high-quality clinical decision-making, is important to improving children's health care. Studies examining PFCC disparities in the general US pediatric population, however, are sparse, and use methodology that might mislead readers to overestimate effect sizes because of the high prevalence of high-quality PFCC. We address these issues using improved statistical modeling of conceptually-grounded disparity domains on more recent data.
This study examined 22,942 children in the 2011 to 2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (pooled cross-section) with at least 1 health care visit in the previous year (eligible for PFCC questions). We used robust-adjusted multivariable Poisson regression to estimate prevalence rate ratios-closer estimates of true risk ratios of highly prevalent outcomes-of 4 measures of high-quality PFCC and a composite measure.
Overall, PFCC quality prevalences were high, ranging from 95% to 97% across the 4 PFCC measures with 92% of parents reporting the composite measure. In multivariable analyses, lower prevalence of high-quality PFCC was consistently observed among publicly insured children (relative to the privately insured, prevalence rate ratios ranging from 0.978 to 0.984 across the PFCC measures; 0.962 in the composite) and children living in families below the poverty line (children at ≥400% of the poverty line had 1.018-1.045 times the prevalence of high-quality PFCC across the PFCC measures; 1.056 in the composite).
Although prevalence rate ratio methodology revealed smaller and perhaps clinically insignificant disparities in US children's PFCC quality than previously portrayed, nonetheless, several statistically significant disparities remain. The most consistent disparities identify those most vulnerable to PFCC quality: publicly insured and impoverished children.
以患者和家庭为中心的护理(PFCC)认为家庭是高质量临床决策中不可或缺的伙伴,这对改善儿童医疗保健至关重要。然而,在美国普通儿科人群中研究PFCC差异的研究较少,并且所使用的方法可能会因高质量PFCC的高患病率而误导读者高估效应大小。我们使用基于概念的差异领域的改进统计模型对更新的数据来解决这些问题。
本研究调查了2011年至2013年医疗支出面板调查(合并横断面)中的22942名儿童,这些儿童在上一年至少有一次医疗保健就诊(符合PFCC问题的条件)。我们使用稳健调整的多变量泊松回归来估计患病率比——对高患病率结果的真实风险比的更接近估计——用于衡量高质量PFCC的4项指标和一项综合指标。
总体而言,PFCC质量患病率很高,4项PFCC指标的患病率在95%至97%之间,92%的家长报告了综合指标。在多变量分析中,在公共保险儿童中始终观察到高质量PFCC的患病率较低(相对于私人保险儿童,PFCC各项指标的患病率比在0.978至0.984之间;综合指标为0.962),以及生活在贫困线以下家庭的儿童(贫困线400%及以上的儿童在PFCC各项指标上高质量PFCC的患病率是贫困线以下儿童的1.018至1.045倍;综合指标为1.056)。
尽管患病率比方法显示,美国儿童PFCC质量的差异比以前描述的要小,可能在临床上也不显著,但仍然存在一些具有统计学意义的差异。最一致的差异表明那些最容易受到PFCC质量影响的人群:公共保险儿童和贫困儿童。