Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, 300 NIB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S178-87. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1008-9.
The objectives of this study are (1) to compare the prevalence of a medical home between children with public and private insurance across states, (2) to investigate the association between a medical home and state health care characteristics for children with public and private insurance. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health, estimating the prevalence of parents' report of a medical home and its components for publicly- and privately-insured children in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We then performed a series of random-effects multilevel logistic regression models to assess the associations between a medical home and insurance type, individual sociodemographic characteristics, and state level characteristics/policies. The prevalence of a medical home varied significantly across states for both publicly- and privately-insured children (ranges: 33-63 % and 57-76 %, respectively). Compared to privately-insured children, publicly-insured children had a lower prevalence of a medical home in all states (public-private difference: 5-34 %). Low prevalence of a medical home was driven primarily by less family-centered care. Variation across states and differences by insurance type were largely attributable to lower reports of a medical home among traditionally vulnerable groups of children, including racial/ethnic minorities and non-English primary language speakers. The prevalence of a medical home was not associated with state level characteristics/policies. There are significant disparities between states in parents' report of a medical home for their children, especially for publicly-insured children. Interventions seeking to address these disparities will need to target family-centered care for traditionally vulnerable populations of children.
(1)比较各州拥有“医疗之家”的儿童中,拥有公共保险和私人保险的儿童之间的比例;(2)调查拥有“医疗之家”与儿童公共保险和私人保险的州医疗保健特征之间的关系。我们对 2007 年全国儿童健康调查进行了横断面分析,估计了所有 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区拥有公共保险和私人保险的儿童家长报告的“医疗之家”及其组成部分的比例。然后,我们进行了一系列随机效应多级逻辑回归模型,以评估“医疗之家”与保险类型、个人社会人口统计学特征以及州级特征/政策之间的关系。对于拥有公共保险和私人保险的儿童来说,“医疗之家”的比例在各州之间存在显著差异(范围分别为 33-63%和 57-76%)。与拥有私人保险的儿童相比,所有州的拥有公共保险的儿童“医疗之家”的比例较低(公共-私人差异:5-34%)。“医疗之家”比例较低主要是因为家庭为中心的护理较少。各州之间的差异以及保险类型之间的差异主要归因于传统弱势群体(包括少数族裔和非英语为母语的人)中“医疗之家”报告比例较低。“医疗之家”的比例与州级特征/政策无关。父母对其子女“医疗之家”的报告在各州之间存在显著差异,尤其是对拥有公共保险的儿童。为了解决这些差异,干预措施需要针对传统弱势群体的以家庭为中心的护理。