• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与基于严重程度的中毒发生率:一项全国性队列研究。

Socioeconomic status and severity-based incidence of poisoning: a nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Song Kyoung Jun, Shin Sang Do, Cone David C

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Sep;47(8):818-26. doi: 10.1080/15563650903158870.

DOI:10.1080/15563650903158870
PMID:19640232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association between severity-based incidence of poisoning and socioeconomic status (SES) was investigated.

METHODS

SES was classified based on the premium level of the National Health Insurance cohort, which are medical aid (MA) population not requiring a premium, five self-employed insured (SEI) population groups, and five employed insured (EI) population groups. The poisoning data sets were obtained from the National Injury Database (2001-2003) of Korea. Severity-based standardized incidence rates (SIRs) were calculated using an excess mortality ratio-adjusted injury severity score (EMR-ISS) similar to the new ISS. EMR-ISS was used to categorize poisoning severity as mild (1 < or = EMR-ISS < or = 8), moderate (10 < or = EMR-ISS < or = 24), severe (25 < or = EMR-ISS < or = 74), or critical (EMR-ISS = 75 or death). The association of household-level SES and severity-based incidence was evaluated using a multiple Poisson regression model with adjustment for the urbanization level and seasonal variations.

RESULTS

The total number of poisoning patients was 83,378. The SIR was 1,584 per 1 million person-years. Critical, severe, moderate, and mild poisoning rates were 16.3, 56.7, 18.7, and 8.3%, respectively. SIRs and relative risks of moderate to critical injuries in the SEI group and of moderate (9 < or = EMR-ISS < 25) injuries in the EI group were strongly and inversely associated with the SES level when compared with MA. When we used the multiple Poisson regression model using the MA group as a reference, adjusted rate ratios were 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.01) for greater than severe poisoning and 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.82) for critical poisoning in the highest SEI. A strong inverse association was found between adjusted incidence of critical poisoning and SEI and EI levels.

CONCLUSION

A strong association between SES levels and severity-based incidence was found in a large nationwide cohort of poisonings.

摘要

背景

研究了基于严重程度的中毒发病率与社会经济地位(SES)之间的关联。

方法

根据国民健康保险队列的保费水平对SES进行分类,即无需缴纳保费的医疗救助(MA)人群、五个个体经营参保(SEI)人群组和五个就业参保(EI)人群组。中毒数据集来自韩国国家伤害数据库(2001 - 2003年)。使用类似于新损伤严重度评分(ISS)的超额死亡率调整损伤严重度评分(EMR - ISS)计算基于严重程度的标准化发病率(SIR)。EMR - ISS用于将中毒严重程度分为轻度(1≤EMR - ISS≤8)、中度(10≤EMR - ISS≤24)、重度(25≤EMR - ISS≤74)或极重度(EMR - ISS = 75或死亡)。使用多泊松回归模型评估家庭层面的SES与基于严重程度的发病率之间的关联,并对城市化水平和季节变化进行调整。

结果

中毒患者总数为83378例。SIR为每100万人年1584例。极重度、重度、中度和轻度中毒率分别为16.3%、56.7%、18.7%和8.3%。与MA组相比,SEI组中重度至极重度损伤的SIR和相对风险以及EI组中中度(9≤EMR - ISS<25)损伤的SIR和相对风险与SES水平呈强烈负相关。当以MA组为参照使用多泊松回归模型时,最高SEI组中重度以上中毒的调整率比为0.97(95%置信区间,0.94 - 1.01),极重度中毒的调整率比为0.75(95%置信区间,0.69 - 0.82)。在极重度中毒的调整发病率与SEI和EI水平之间发现了强烈的负相关。

结论

在一个大型全国性中毒队列中发现SES水平与基于严重程度的发病率之间存在强烈关联。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and severity-based incidence of poisoning: a nationwide cohort study.社会经济地位与基于严重程度的中毒发生率:一项全国性队列研究。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Sep;47(8):818-26. doi: 10.1080/15563650903158870.
2
Association between socioeconomic status and burn injury severity.社会经济地位与烧伤严重程度的关系。
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
3
Development and validation of the Excess Mortality Ratio-adjusted Injury Severity Score Using the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition.使用国际疾病分类第10版开发和验证超额死亡率调整后的损伤严重程度评分
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 May;16(5):454-464. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00412.x.
4
Lifelong cancer incidence in 47,697 patients treated for childhood cancer in the Nordic countries.北欧47697名接受儿童癌症治疗患者的终身癌症发病率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):806-13. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp104. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries.一项基于人群的创伤性脑损伤后癫痫发作的研究。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 1;338(1):20-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801013380104.
6
Comparison of mortality due to severe multiple trauma in two comprehensive models of emergency care: Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain).两种综合急救模式下严重多发伤死亡率的比较:法国大西洋比利牛斯省和西班牙纳瓦拉省
J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.089. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Mortality patterns and the effect of socioeconomic factors on mortality in rural Tamil Nadu, south India: a community-based cohort study.印度南部泰米尔纳德邦农村地区的死亡率模式及社会经济因素对死亡率的影响:一项基于社区的队列研究。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Aug;103(8):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 May 22.
8
Distribution and determinants of critical illness among status Aboriginal Canadians. A population-based assessment.加拿大原住民重症疾病的分布及决定因素。一项基于人群的评估。
J Crit Care. 2006 Sep;21(3):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.03.012.
9
The effect of gender on patients with moderate to severe head injuries.性别对中重度颅脑损伤患者的影响。
J Trauma. 2009 Nov;67(5):950-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ba3354.
10
AIDS mortality before and after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy: does it vary with socioeconomic group in a country with a National Health System?高效抗逆转录病毒疗法引入前后的艾滋病死亡率:在一个拥有国家卫生系统的国家,其在社会经济群体中是否存在差异?
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Dec;16(6):601-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl062. Epub 2006 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of overdose episodes from the period prior to hospitalization for drug poisoning until discharge in Japan: An exploratory descriptive study using a nationwide claims database.日本从药物中毒住院前到出院期间药物过量事件的流行病学:一项使用全国索赔数据库的探索性描述性研究。
J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.010. Epub 2017 Feb 24.