Ovenden Jenny R, Kashiwagi Tom, Broderick Damien, Giles Jenny, Salini John
Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Feb 12;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-40.
The territorial fishing zones of Australia and Indonesia are contiguous to the north of Australia in the Timor and Arafura Seas and in the Indian Ocean to the north of Christmas Island. The area surrounding the shared boundary consists of a variety of bio-diverse marine habitats including shallow continental shelf waters, oceanic trenches and numerous offshore islands. Both countries exploit a variety of fisheries species, including whaler (Carcharhinus spp.) and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.). Despite their differences in social and financial arrangements, the two countries are motivated to develop complementary co-management practices to achieve resource sustainability. An essential starting point is knowledge of the degree of population subdivision, and hence fisheries stock status, in exploited species.
Populations of four commercially harvested shark species (Carcharhinus obscurus, Carcharhinus sorrah, Prionace glauca, Sphyrna lewini) were sampled from northern Australia and central Indonesia. Neutral genetic markers (mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and allelic variation at co-dominant microsatellite loci) revealed genetic subdivision between Australian and Indonesian populations of C. sorrah. Further research is needed to address the possibility of genetic subdivision among C. obscurus populations. There was no evidence of genetic subdivision for P. glauca and S. lewini populations, but the sampling represented a relatively small part of their distributional range. For these species, more detailed analyses of population genetic structure is recommended in the future.
Cooperative management between Australia and Indonesia is the best option at present for P. glauca and S. lewini, while C. sorrah and C. obscurus should be managed independently. On-going research on these and other exploited shark and ray species is strongly recommended. Biological and ecological similarity between species may not be a predictor of population genetic structure, so species-specific studies are recommended to provide new data to assist with sustainable fisheries management.
澳大利亚和印度尼西亚的领海在澳大利亚北部的帝汶海、阿拉弗拉海以及圣诞岛以北的印度洋相邻。共同边界周边地区包含各种生物多样的海洋栖息地,包括浅海大陆架水域、海沟和众多近海岛屿。两国都开发多种渔业物种,包括黑鳍鲨(真鲨属物种)和双髻鲨(双髻鲨属物种)。尽管两国在社会和财政安排上存在差异,但都有动力制定互补性的共同管理措施以实现资源可持续性。一个关键的出发点是了解被开发物种的种群细分程度,进而了解渔业资源状况。
从澳大利亚北部和印度尼西亚中部采集了四种商业捕捞鲨鱼物种(铅灰真鲨、沙拉真鲨、大青鲨、长吻双髻鲨)的样本。中性遗传标记(线粒体DNA控制区序列和共显性微卫星位点的等位基因变异)显示,沙拉真鲨的澳大利亚种群和印度尼西亚种群之间存在遗传细分。需要进一步研究来探讨铅灰真鲨种群之间遗传细分的可能性。没有证据表明大青鲨和长吻双髻鲨种群存在遗传细分,但所采集的样本仅占其分布范围的相对较小部分。对于这些物种,建议未来对种群遗传结构进行更详细的分析。
目前,澳大利亚和印度尼西亚之间的合作管理是大青鲨和长吻双髻鲨的最佳选择,而沙拉真鲨和铅灰真鲨应独立管理。强烈建议对这些以及其他被开发的鲨鱼和鳐鱼物种持续开展研究。物种之间的生物学和生态相似性可能不是种群遗传结构的预测指标,因此建议开展特定物种研究以提供新数据,协助实现可持续渔业管理。