Proctor Briley E, Prevatt Frances
Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, Florida State University, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2009 May-Jun;42(3):250-9. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331043. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
This study used confirmatory factor analysis to compare one-, two-, and three-factor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms to determine which model is the best fit for the data. Participants were 190 clinic-referred college students who had been evaluated for ADHD, 155 of whom had received a diagnosis. Data consisted of both self- and other (e.g., parent) ratings of both current and childhood symptoms. Symptoms came directly from the DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. A three-factor model, consistent with the DSM-III, was superior for current and childhood symptoms, regardless of rater (i.e., self or parent). The primary implication for these findings is that there may be a viable Impulsive subtype of ADHD within the adult population. Further research might include a closer examination of the unique functional limitations associated with impulsivity, as well as the development of diagnostic items that maximize model fit.
本研究采用验证性因素分析来比较注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状的单因素、双因素和三因素模型,以确定哪种模型最适合这些数据。参与者为190名因ADHD接受评估的临床转介大学生,其中155人已被诊断。数据包括当前症状和童年症状的自评及他人(如父母)评定。症状直接来自DSM-IV中ADHD的标准。与DSM-III一致的三因素模型,无论评定者是本人还是父母,对当前症状和童年症状来说都是最佳的。这些发现的主要意义在于,在成年人群中可能存在一种可行的ADHD冲动亚型。进一步的研究可能包括更仔细地检查与冲动相关的独特功能限制,以及开发能使模型拟合最大化的诊断项目。