• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来氟米特在新西兰的应用。一项全国性前瞻性上市后研究。

Leflunomide use in New Zealand. A national prospective post-marketing study.

机构信息

Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, QE Health, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2009 Feb;39(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01792.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01792.x
PMID:19220542
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This post-marketing study aimed to record rates of retention, adverse effects and efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The secondary objectives were to make a semi-quantitative assessment of response to treatment and to examine the effect of a loading dose on adverse events and treatment duration.

METHODS

Rheumatologists in New Zealand contributed to a prospective leflunomide treatment registry. Baseline data were collected on leflunomide initiation and information about treatment experience was sought every 6 months. Each patient was followed for 2 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate differences in stopping rates between lack of efficacy and adverse effects. Hazard analysis was used to evaluate the effect of using a loading dose on retention rate.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eight patients were enrolled in the study; complete follow-up data were available for 244 patients. Retention of patients on leflunomide was 64% at 12 months and 49.4% at 2 years. Reasons for stopping were adverse events (54 patients), loss of effect (25 patients) and miscellaneous reasons (14 patients). Use of a loading dose had no effect on retention; there was no difference in treatment duration between those who stopped from adverse effects or loss of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide was effective in treating RA in a group that had longer duration of disease and greater prior use of disease-modifying agents than the groups studied in clinical trials. Rates of withdrawal were lower than those reported in other post-marketing studies, but were higher than those from phase III clinical trials.

摘要

背景

本上市后研究旨在记录来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的保留率、不良反应和疗效。次要目标是对治疗反应进行半定量评估,并研究负荷剂量对不良反应和治疗持续时间的影响。

方法

新西兰的风湿病学家参与了前瞻性来氟米特治疗登记。在开始使用来氟米特时收集基线数据,并每 6 个月寻求有关治疗经验的信息。每位患者随访 2 年。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于评估因疗效不佳和不良反应而停药率的差异。风险分析用于评估使用负荷剂量对保留率的影响。

结果

本研究共纳入 308 例患者;244 例患者可获得完整的随访数据。来氟米特治疗 12 个月时的保留率为 64%,2 年时为 49.4%。停药的原因是不良反应(54 例)、失效(25 例)和其他原因(14 例)。使用负荷剂量对保留率没有影响;因不良反应或疗效丧失而停药的患者的治疗持续时间没有差异。

结论

来氟米特在治疗疾病持续时间较长且先前使用过改善病情的抗风湿药物的 RA 患者中有效,与临床试验中研究的患者相比。停药率低于其他上市后研究报告的水平,但高于 III 期临床试验报告的水平。

相似文献

1
Leflunomide use in New Zealand. A national prospective post-marketing study.来氟米特在新西兰的应用。一项全国性前瞻性上市后研究。
Intern Med J. 2009 Feb;39(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01792.x.
2
Leflunomide, a new disease-modifying drug for treating active rheumatoid arthritis in methotrexate-controlled phase II clinical trial.来氟米特,一种用于治疗甲氨蝶呤控制期的活动性类风湿关节炎的新型改善病情药物,处于II期临床试验阶段。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Aug;116(8):1228-34.
3
Two-year, blinded, randomized, controlled trial of treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with methotrexate. Utilization of Leflunomide in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Investigator Group.来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的两年双盲随机对照试验。类风湿关节炎治疗中来氟米特应用试验研究组。
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1984-92. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<1984::AID-ART346>3.0.CO;2-B.
4
The efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a five-year followup study.来氟米特治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项五年随访研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun;48(6):1513-20. doi: 10.1002/art.11015.
5
Clinical data gap between phase III clinical trials (pre-marketing) and phase IV (post-marketing) studies: evaluation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis.III期临床试验(上市前)与IV期(上市后)研究之间的临床数据差距:类风湿关节炎中依那西普的评估
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Fall;12(3):e254-63. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
6
Leflunomide: a manageable safety profile.来氟米特:安全性可控。
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2004 Jun;71:21-4.
7
The influence of previous and concomitant leflunomide on the efficacy and safety of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; a longitudinal observational study.既往及同时使用来氟米特对类风湿关节炎患者英夫利昔单抗治疗疗效及安全性的影响;一项纵向观察性研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Apr;44(4):472-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh508. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
8
Improved functional ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--longterm treatment with leflunomide versus sulfasalazine. European Leflunomide Study Group.来氟米特与柳氮磺胺吡啶对类风湿关节炎患者长期治疗的疗效比较——改善功能能力。欧洲来氟米特研究小组。
J Rheumatol. 2001 Sep;28(9):1983-91.
9
Reduction of the efficacy of methotrexate by the use of folic acid: post hoc analysis from two randomized controlled studies.使用叶酸导致甲氨蝶呤疗效降低:两项随机对照研究的事后分析
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3030-8. doi: 10.1002/art.21295.
10
Toward a definition and method of assessment of treatment failure and treatment effectiveness: the case of leflunomide versus methotrexate.迈向治疗失败与治疗效果的定义及评估方法:来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤的案例
J Rheumatol. 2003 Aug;30(8):1725-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical effectiveness and safety of leflunomide in inflammatory arthritis: a report from the RAPPORT database with supporting patient survey.来氟米特治疗炎性关节炎的临床疗效与安全性:来自RAPPORT数据库的报告及相关患者调查
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;36(7):1471-1478. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3687-5. Epub 2017 May 27.
2
Reappraisal of the clinical use of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.来氟米特在类风湿关节炎和银屑病关节炎临床应用的重新评估
Open Access Rheumatol. 2010 Nov 3;2:53-71. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S9448. eCollection 2010.
3
Teriflunomide.
特立氟胺
Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Jun;3(3):254-260. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e318296f299.
4
An update of teriflunomide for treatment of multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症的更新。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2013;9:177-90. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S30947. Epub 2013 Apr 26.