Khanna Dinesh, Park Grace S, Paulus Harold E, Simpson Karen M, Elashoff David, Cohen Stanley B, Emery Paul, Dorrier Catharine, Furst Daniel E
Division of Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0563, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3030-8. doi: 10.1002/art.21295.
To examine the effect of folic acid on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of leflunomide in which MTX was used as a comparator.
Analyses were restricted to patients randomized to receive MTX who had rheumatoid factor data. The US study recruited 482 patients with active RA; 179 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and all were mandated to receive 1 mg of oral folic acid once or twice daily. The multinational European study recruited 999 patients with active RA; 489 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and oral folic acid was not required, although 50 received folate after developing an adverse event. Because of similar entry criteria for both studies, the data for patients with available primary outcome data at week 52 were pooled (n = 668), and the patients were grouped by folic acid use (n = 225) and nonuse (n = 443). To account for the significant between-study differences in the MTX groups, baseline covariates were adjusted using propensity scores so that folic acid users could be matched with nonusers. This allowed for a comparison of differences in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria at week 52.
At study entry, non-folic acid users had a significantly lower mean body weight, shorter mean RA duration, and higher mean disease activity (measured by joint counts, patient's and physician's global assessments, and acute-phase reactant levels). The mean MTX dosage at week 52 was similar in the 2 RCTs. Using propensity score matching techniques, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR 20% response at week 52 averaged 17% higher in the non-folic acid group than in the folic acid group (range 15-21%). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50% and ACR 70% responses averaged 14% (range 12-16%) and 12% (range 9-14%) higher, respectively, in the non-folic acid group. Adverse events were reported in 93% of US study patients and 94% of the multinational study patients. Elevated liver transaminase levels (above the upper limit of normal) were reported in 29% of the US study patients (majority receiving folic acid) and 62% of the multinational study patients (majority not receiving folic acid).
After using propensity scores to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of folic acid users and non-folic acid users, 9-21% fewer MTX-treated RA patients taking folic acid had ACR 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement at 52 weeks compared with those who did not receive folic acid in the 2 phase III RA clinical trials. As a post hoc analysis, the results of this data analysis should be considered "hypothesis generating" and an impetus for future studies regarding the effects of folic acid on the efficacy of MTX in RA.
在两项来氟米特的III期随机对照试验(RCT)中,以甲氨蝶呤(MTX)作为对照,研究叶酸对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者12个月时MTX治疗效果的影响。
分析仅限于随机接受MTX治疗且有类风湿因子数据的患者。美国的研究招募了482例活动期RA患者;179例接受了至少1剂MTX,且均被要求每日口服1 mg叶酸1次或2次。欧洲多国研究招募了999例活动期RA患者;489例接受了至少1剂MTX,不要求口服叶酸,不过有50例在出现不良事件后接受了叶酸治疗。由于两项研究的入选标准相似,将第52周时有可用主要结局数据的患者数据进行合并(n = 668),并根据叶酸使用情况将患者分为使用组(n = 225)和未使用组(n = 443)。为了考虑MTX组间的显著差异,使用倾向评分对基线协变量进行调整,以便叶酸使用者能够与未使用者匹配。这使得能够比较第52周时达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)20%改善标准的差异。
在研究入组时,未使用叶酸的患者平均体重显著更低,RA病程平均更短,疾病活动度更高(通过关节计数、患者和医生的整体评估以及急性期反应物水平衡量)。两项RCT中第52周时的平均MTX剂量相似。使用倾向评分匹配技术,未使用叶酸组在第52周时达到ACR 20%缓解的患者比例比使用叶酸组平均高17%(范围为15% - 21%)。同样,未使用叶酸组达到ACR 50%和ACR 70%缓解的患者比例分别平均高14%(范围为12% - 16%)和12%(范围为9% - 14%)。美国研究中93%的患者和多国研究中94%的患者报告了不良事件。美国研究中29%的患者(大多数接受叶酸)和多国研究中62%的患者(大多数未接受叶酸)报告了肝转氨酶水平升高(高于正常上限)。
在使用倾向评分调整叶酸使用者和未使用者的基线特征差异后,在两项III期RA临床试验中,与未接受叶酸的患者相比,接受MTX治疗且服用叶酸的RA患者在52周时达到ACR 20%、50%或70%改善的比例要低9% - 21%。作为一项事后分析,该数据分析结果应被视为“产生假设”,并为未来关于叶酸对RA中MTX疗效影响的研究提供动力。