• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接孔径优化作为降低调强放射治疗计划复杂性的一种手段。

Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans.

作者信息

Broderick Maria, Leech Michelle, Coffey Mary

机构信息

Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb 16;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-8.

DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-4-8
PMID:19220906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2647925/
Abstract

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is a means of delivering radiation therapy where the intensity of the beam is varied within the treatment field. This is done by dividing a large beam into many small beamlets. Dose constraints are assigned to both the target and sensitive structures and computerised inverse optimization is performed to find the individual weights of this large number of beamlets. The computer adjusts the intensities of these beamlets according to the required planning dose objectives. The optimized intensity patterns are then decomposed into a series of deliverable multi leaf collimator (MLC) shapes in the sequencing step. One of the main problems of IMRT, which becomes even more apparent as the complexity of the IMRT plan increases, is the dramatic increase in the number of Monitor Units (MU) required to deliver a fractionated treatment. The difficulty with this increase in MU is its association with increased treatment times and a greater leakage of radiation from the MLCs increasing the total body dose and the risk of secondary cancers in patients. Therefore one attempts to find ways of reducing these MU without compromising plan quality. The design of inverse planning systems where the beam is divided into small beamlets to produce the required intensity map automatically introduces complexity into IMRT treatment planning. Plan complexity is associated with many negative factors such as dosimetric uncertainty and delivery issues A large search space is required necessitating much computing power. However, the limitations of the delivery technology are not taken into consideration when designing the ideal intensity map therefore a further step termed the sequencing step is required to convert the ideal intensity map into a deliverable one. Many approaches have been taken to reduce the complexity. These include setting intensity limits, putting penalties on the cost function and using smoothing filters Direct Aperture optimization (DAO) incorporates the limitations of the delivery technology at the initial design of the intensity map thereby eliminating the sequencing step. It also gives control over the number of segments and hence control over the complexity of the plan although the design of the segments is independent of the person preparing the plan.

摘要

调强放射治疗(IMRT)是一种实施放射治疗的方法,其中射束强度在治疗野内是变化的。这是通过将一个大射束分割成许多小射束单元来实现的。剂量约束被分配给靶区和敏感结构,并进行计算机化的逆向优化,以确定这大量射束单元各自的权重。计算机根据所需的计划剂量目标调整这些射束单元的强度。然后在排序步骤中,将优化后的强度模式分解为一系列可交付的多叶准直器(MLC)形状。IMRT的一个主要问题,随着IMRT计划复杂性的增加变得更加明显,就是在进行分次治疗时所需的监测单位(MU)数量急剧增加。MU增加带来的困难在于它与治疗时间增加以及来自MLC的辐射泄漏增加相关,从而增加了患者的全身剂量和继发癌症的风险。因此,人们试图找到在不影响计划质量的情况下减少这些MU的方法。逆向计划系统的设计是将射束分割成小射束单元以自动生成所需的强度图,这给IMRT治疗计划引入了复杂性。计划复杂性与许多负面因素相关,如剂量学不确定性和交付问题,需要一个大的搜索空间,因此需要大量计算能力。然而,在设计理想强度图时没有考虑到交付技术的局限性,所以需要进一步的步骤,即排序步骤,将理想强度图转换为可交付的强度图。已经采取了许多方法来降低复杂性。这些方法包括设置强度限制、对成本函数施加惩罚以及使用平滑滤波器。直接孔径优化(DAO)在强度图的初始设计中纳入了交付技术的局限性,从而消除了排序步骤。它还能控制段的数量,进而控制计划的复杂性,尽管段的设计与准备计划的人员无关。

相似文献

1
Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans.直接孔径优化作为降低调强放射治疗计划复杂性的一种手段。
Radiat Oncol. 2009 Feb 16;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-8.
2
Inverse-optimized 3D conformal planning: minimizing complexity while achieving equivalence with beamlet IMRT in multiple clinical sites.逆向优化 3D 适形计划:在多个临床部位实现与射束角调强放射治疗等效的同时,最小化复杂性。
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3361-74. doi: 10.1118/1.4709604.
3
Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗中射束几何形状与强度图的同步优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):301-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
4
Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function.通过在目标函数中使用射束调制惩罚来降低调强放射治疗(IMRT)射束的复杂性。
Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):507-20. doi: 10.1118/1.2409749.
5
A novel software and conceptual design of the hardware platform for intensity modulated radiation therapy.一种用于调强放射治疗的新型软件及硬件平台概念设计。
Med Phys. 2016 Feb;43(2):917-29. doi: 10.1118/1.4940353.
6
A fast inverse direct aperture optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.一种用于强度调制放射治疗的快速逆直接射野优化算法。
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1127-1139. doi: 10.1002/mp.13368. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
7
Inverse-planned deliverable 4D-IMRT for lung SBRT.用于肺部 SBRT 的逆计划可交付 4D-IMRT。
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):5145-5160. doi: 10.1002/mp.13157. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Dosimetric quality, accuracy, and deliverability of modulated radiotherapy treatments for spinal metastases.脊柱转移瘤调强放疗的剂量学质量、准确性及可交付性
Med Dosim. 2016 Autumn;41(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.06.006.
9
Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality.子野步长对调强放疗计划质量的影响。
Med Phys. 2005 Nov;32(11):3448-54. doi: 10.1118/1.2098107.
10
Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning.在逆向计划期间使用强度限制提高调强放疗(IMRT)的递送效率
Med Phys. 2005 May;32(5):1234-45. doi: 10.1118/1.1895545.

引用本文的文献

1
A dosimetric evaluation of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Ghana.加纳前列腺癌调强放射治疗和三维适形放射治疗的剂量学评估
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 May 31;18:1707. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1707. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of ovary-sparing treatment planning on plan quality, treatment time and gamma passing rates in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage I/II cervical cancer.保留卵巢的治疗计划对Ⅰ/Ⅱ期宫颈癌调强放疗计划质量、治疗时间和伽马通过率的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36373. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036373.
3
Progressive resolution optimizer (PRO) predominates over photon optimizer (PO) in sparing of spinal cord for spine SABR VMAT plans.渐进分辨率优化器(PRO)在脊柱 SABR VMAT 计划中优于光子优化器(PO),可减少脊髓剂量。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 16;23(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10925-z.
4
Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.在线自适应调强放疗计划方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 11;68(10). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2.
5
Does Fluence Smoothing Reduce the Complexity of the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plan? A Dosimetric Analysis.fluence平滑处理能否降低调强放射治疗计划的复杂性?剂量学分析。
J Med Phys. 2022 Oct-Dec;47(4):336-343. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_81_22. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.调强适形放疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)计划的复杂度指标:对当前文献和应用的综述。
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190270. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190270. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.在调强质子治疗中使用二次目标函数进行稳健优化以考虑最小监测单位约束。
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):460-469. doi: 10.1002/mp.12677. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
Dosimetric evaluation of a simple planning method for improving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer.一种用于改善III期肺癌调强放射治疗的简单计划方法的剂量学评估
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23543. doi: 10.1038/srep23543.
9
Effect of fluence smoothing on the quality of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans.注量平滑对调强放射治疗计划质量的影响。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2016 Jul;9(2):202-13. doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0349-2. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
10
A simple optimization approach for improving target dose homogeneity in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer.一种用于改善鼻窦癌调强放射治疗中靶区剂量均匀性的简单优化方法。
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 26;5:15361. doi: 10.1038/srep15361.

本文引用的文献

1
Dosimetric study of inverse-planed intensity modulated, forward-planned intensity modulated and conventional tangential techniques in breast conserving radiotherapy.保乳放疗中逆向计划调强放疗、正向计划调强放疗和传统切线技术的剂量学研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91(10):1571-82.
2
Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.直接孔径优化应用于头颈部调强放射治疗时的临床评估
Med Dosim. 2008 Spring;33(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.002.
3
The potential for dose dumping in normal tissues with IMRT for pelvic and H&N cancers.调强放射治疗用于盆腔和头颈部癌症时正常组织中剂量倾泻的可能性。
Med Dosim. 2008 Spring;33(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.05.001.
4
Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.通过西门子直线加速器实施的不同调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术外周剂量的实验测定。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Feb;184(2):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1743-4.
5
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy--what is it?调强放射治疗——是什么?
Cancer Imaging. 2004 Mar 26;4(2):68-73. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0003.
6
Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.调强放射治疗(IMRT)两步优化与一步优化计划的比较:一种简化IMRT的方法
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 7;53(3):807-21. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/018. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
7
What is an acceptably smoothed fluence? Dosimetric and delivery considerations for dynamic sliding window IMRT.什么是可接受的平滑注量?动态滑动窗口调强放疗的剂量学与剂量传递考量
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Nov 23;2:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-42.
8
A treatment planning analysis of inverse-planned and forward-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌逆向计划和正向计划调强放射治疗的治疗计划分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.028.
9
Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.下咽癌调强放射治疗中直接机器参数优化与采用顺序排序的射束通量优化的比较
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Sep 6;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-33.
10
Uncertainty of calculated risk estimates for secondary malignancies after radiotherapy.放射治疗后继发性恶性肿瘤计算风险估计的不确定性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.014.