Haley Stephen M, Ni Pengsheng, Dumas Helene M, Fragala-Pinkham Maria A, Hambleton Ronald K, Montpetit Kathleen, Bilodeau Nathalie, Gorton George E, Watson Kyle, Tucker Carole A
Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, 580 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02218, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):359-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9447-5. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
The purposes of this study were to apply a bi-factor model for the determination of test dimensionality and a multidimensional CAT using computer simulations of real data for the assessment of a new global physical health measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Parent respondents of 306 children with cerebral palsy were recruited from four pediatric rehabilitation hospitals and outpatient clinics. We compared confirmatory factor analysis results across four models: (1) one-factor unidimensional; (2) two-factor multidimensional (MIRT); (3) bi-factor MIRT with fixed slopes; and (4) bi-factor MIRT with varied slopes. We tested whether the general and content (fatigue and pain) person score estimates could discriminate across severity and types of CP, and whether score estimates from a simulated CAT were similar to estimates based on the total item bank, and whether they correlated as expected with external measures.
Confirmatory factor analysis suggested separate pain and fatigue sub-factors; all 37 items were retained in the analyses. From the bi-factor MIRT model with fixed slopes, the full item bank scores discriminated across levels of severity and types of CP, and compared favorably to external instruments. CAT scores based on 10- and 15-item versions accurately captured the global physical health scores.
The bi-factor MIRT CAT application, especially the 10- and 15-item versions, yielded accurate global physical health scores that discriminated across known severity groups and types of CP, and correlated as expected with concurrent measures. The CATs have potential for collecting complex data on the physical health of children with CP in an efficient manner.
本研究旨在应用双因素模型确定测试维度,并使用真实数据的计算机模拟进行多维计算机自适应测试(CAT),以评估一种针对脑瘫(CP)儿童的新的全球身体健康测量方法。
从四家儿科康复医院和门诊诊所招募了306名脑瘫儿童的家长作为受访者。我们比较了四个模型的验证性因素分析结果:(1)单因素一维模型;(2)双因素多维模型(MIRT);(3)固定斜率的双因素MIRT模型;(4)可变斜率的双因素MIRT模型。我们测试了一般和内容(疲劳和疼痛)个人得分估计是否能够区分不同严重程度和类型的CP,模拟CAT的得分估计是否与基于整个项目库的估计相似,以及它们是否与外部测量按预期相关。
验证性因素分析表明存在单独的疼痛和疲劳子因素;所有37个项目都保留在分析中。从固定斜率的双因素MIRT模型来看,整个项目库得分能够区分不同严重程度和类型的CP,并且与外部工具相比表现良好。基于10项和15项版本的CAT得分准确地捕捉了全球身体健康得分。
双因素MIRT CAT应用,尤其是10项和15项版本,产生了准确的全球身体健康得分,能够区分已知的严重程度组和CP类型,并且与并行测量按预期相关。CAT有潜力以高效的方式收集关于CP儿童身体健康的复杂数据。