Coster Wendy J, Haley Stephen M, Ni Pengsheng, Dumas Helene M, Fragala-Pinkham Maria A
Department of Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation Counseling, Boston University Sargent College, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):622-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.053.
To examine score agreement, validity, precision, and response burden of a prototype computer adaptive testing (CAT) version of the self-care and social function scales of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory compared with the full-length version of these scales.
Computer simulation analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal retrospective data; cross-sectional prospective study.
Pediatric rehabilitation hospital, including inpatient acute rehabilitation, day school program, outpatient clinics; community-based day care, preschool, and children's homes.
Children with disabilities (n=469) and 412 children with no disabilities (analytic sample); 38 children with disabilities and 35 children without disabilities (cross-validation sample).
Not applicable.
Summary scores from prototype CAT applications of each scale using 15-, 10-, and 5-item stopping rules; scores from the full-length self-care and social function scales; time (in seconds) to complete assessments and respondent ratings of burden.
Scores from both computer simulations and field administration of the prototype CATs were highly consistent with scores from full-length administration (r range, .94-.99). Using computer simulation of retrospective data, discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change of the CATs closely approximated that of the full-length scales, especially when the 15- and 10-item stopping rules were applied. In the cross-validation study the time to administer both CATs was 4 minutes, compared with over 16 minutes to complete the full-length scales.
Self-care and social function score estimates from CAT administration are highly comparable with those obtained from full-length scale administration, with small losses in validity and precision and substantial decreases in administration time.
与《儿童残疾评定量表》自我照护和社会功能量表的完整版相比,检验该量表计算机自适应测试(CAT)原型版本的评分一致性、效度、精密度和应答负担。
对横断面和纵向回顾性数据进行计算机模拟分析;横断面前瞻性研究。
儿科康复医院,包括住院急性康复、日间学校项目、门诊诊所;社区日托中心、幼儿园和儿童之家。
残疾儿童(n = 469)和412名无残疾儿童(分析样本);38名残疾儿童和35名无残疾儿童(交叉验证样本)。
不适用。
使用15项、10项和5项停止规则的各量表CAT原型应用的汇总分数;自我照护和社会功能量表完整版的分数;完成评估的时间(秒)和应答者对负担的评分。
计算机模拟和CAT原型现场施测的分数与完整版施测的分数高度一致(r范围为0.94 - 0.99)。使用回顾性数据的计算机模拟,CAT的判别效度和对变化的敏感性与完整版量表非常接近,尤其是应用15项和10项停止规则时。在交叉验证研究中,两种CAT施测的时间为4分钟,而完成完整版量表的时间超过16分钟。
CAT施测的自我照护和社会功能评分估计与完整版量表获得的数据具有高度可比性,效度和精密度略有损失,但施测时间大幅减少。