Panzer Martina, Renner Britta
Jacobs Center for Lifelong Learning, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759, Bremen, Germany.
J Behav Med. 2009 Aug;32(4):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9206-7. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
Research on the reception of health risk feedback has focused on the analysis of single, researcher-selected cognitive reactions. The full range of spontaneous reactions and their patterns have received little attention. The present paper explores content, interrelations, and adaptivity of spontaneous reactions to health risk feedback from a network perspective. Participants (n = 423) received blood pressure and cholesterol feedback and listed their thoughts afterwards. A network of reactions to health risk feedback was constructed from the responses. Emotions, risk feedback valence, future lifestyle, and expectedness emerged as strong and largely well-connected network nodes, while previously well-researched reactions like feedback acceptance formed small, less connected nodes. The majority of reaction patterns identified through the network appeared adaptive, even after negative feedback. The network provides a potentially useful tool for research and practice, highlighting previously neglected relevant reactions, and providing a group-level background against which individual reactions can be evaluated.
关于健康风险反馈接受度的研究主要集中在对单一的、由研究者选定的认知反应进行分析。而对一系列自发反应及其模式的关注却很少。本文从网络视角探讨了对健康风险反馈的自发反应的内容、相互关系和适应性。参与者（n = 423）收到了血压和胆固醇反馈，之后列出了他们的想法。根据这些回答构建了一个对健康风险反馈的反应网络。情绪、风险反馈效价、未来生活方式和预期性成为强大且联系紧密的网络节点，而此前经过充分研究的反馈接受等反应则形成了较小且联系较少的节点。通过该网络识别出的大多数反应模式似乎都是适应性的，即使在负面反馈之后也是如此。该网络为研究和实践提供了一个潜在有用的工具，突出了此前被忽视的相关反应，并提供了一个群体层面的背景，据此可以评估个体反应。
