Heine Steven J, Hamamura Takeshi
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Feb;11(1):4-27. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294587.
A meta-analysis of published cross-cultural studies of self-enhancement reveals pervasive and pronounced differences between East Asians and Westerners. Across 91 comparisons, the average cross-cultural effect was d = .84. The effect emerged in all 30 methods, except for comparisons of implicit self-esteem. Within cultures, Westerners showed a clear self-serving bias (d = .87), whereas East Asians did not (d = -.01), with Asian Americans falling in between (d = .52). East Asians did self-enhance in the methods that involved comparing themselves to average but were self-critical in other methods. It was hypothesized that this inconsistency could be explained in that these methods are compromised by the "everyone is better than their group's average effect" (EBTA). Supporting this rationale, studies that were implicated by the EBTA reported significantly larger self-enhancement effect for all cultures compared to other studies. Overall, the evidence converges to show that East Asians do not self-enhance.
一项对已发表的关于自我提升的跨文化研究的荟萃分析显示,东亚人和西方人之间存在普遍且显著的差异。在91项比较中,平均跨文化效应为d = 0.84。除了对内隐自尊的比较外,在所有30种方法中都出现了这种效应。在不同文化中,西方人表现出明显的自利偏差(d = 0.87),而东亚人则没有(d = -0.01),亚裔美国人则介于两者之间(d = 0.52)。东亚人在将自己与平均水平进行比较的方法中确实会自我提升,但在其他方法中则会自我批评。据推测,这种不一致可以解释为这些方法受到“每个人都比他们群体的平均水平更好效应”(EBTA)的影响。支持这一理论基础的是,与其他研究相比,受EBTA影响的研究报告称,所有文化中的自我提升效应都显著更大。总体而言,证据表明东亚人不会自我提升。