Brinkworth Grant D, Noakes Manny, Clifton Peter M, Bird Anthony R
Preventative Health National Research Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Human Nutrition, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Br J Nutr. 2009 May;101(10):1493-502. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508094658. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
Very low-carbohydrate diets are often used to promote weight loss, but their effects on bowel health and function are largely unknown. We compared the effects of a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat (LC) diet with a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat (HC) diet on indices of bowel health and function. In a parallel study design, ninety-one overweight and obese participants (age 50.6 (sd 7.5) years; BMI 33.7 (sd 4.2) kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to either an energy-restricted (about 6-7 MJ, 30 % deficit) planned isoenergetic LC or HC diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and week 8, 24 h urine and faecal collections were obtained and a bowel function questionnaire was completed. Compared with the HC group, there were significant reductions in the LC group for faecal output (21 (sd 145) v. - 61 (sd 147) g), defecation frequency, faecal excretion and concentrations of butyrate ( - 0.5 (sd 10.4) v. - 3.9 (sd 9.7) mmol/l) and total SCFA (1.4 (sd 40.5) v. - 15.8 (sd 43.6) mmol/l) and counts of bifidobacteria (P < 0.05 time x diet interaction, for all). Urinary phenols and p-cresol excretion decreased (P < or = 0.003 for time) with no difference between diets (P > or = 0.25). Faecal form, pH, ammonia concentration and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli did not change with either diet. No differences between the diets were evident for incidences of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms, which suggests that both diets were well tolerated. Under energy-restricted conditions, a short-term LC diet lowered stool weight and had detrimental effects on the concentration and excretion of faecal SCFA compared with an HC diet. This suggests that the long-term consumption of an LC diet may increase the risk of development of gastrointestinal disorders.
极低碳水化合物饮食常被用于促进体重减轻,但其对肠道健康和功能的影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们比较了极低碳水化合物、高脂肪(LC)饮食与高碳水化合物、高纤维、低脂肪(HC)饮食对肠道健康和功能指标的影响。在一项平行研究设计中,91名超重和肥胖参与者(年龄50.6(标准差7.5)岁;体重指数33.7(标准差4.2)kg/m²)被随机分配到能量限制(约6 - 7兆焦耳,30%的热量缺口)的等能量LC或HC饮食组,为期8周。在基线期和第8周时,收集24小时尿液和粪便样本,并完成一份肠道功能问卷。与HC组相比,LC组的粪便量显著减少(21(标准差145)克对 - 61(标准差147)克)、排便频率、粪便排泄以及丁酸盐浓度( - 0.5(标准差10.4)毫摩尔/升对 - 3.9(标准差9.7)毫摩尔/升)和总短链脂肪酸(1.4(标准差40.5)毫摩尔/升对 - 15.8(标准差43.6)毫摩尔/升)以及双歧杆菌计数均显著降低(所有指标的时间×饮食交互作用P < 0.05)。尿酚和对甲酚排泄量随时间减少(时间效应P < 或 = 0.003),饮食之间无差异(P > 或 = 0.25)。粪便形态、pH值、氨浓度以及大肠菌群和大肠杆菌数量在两种饮食下均未改变。两种饮食在不良胃肠道症状发生率方面无明显差异,这表明两种饮食耐受性都良好。在能量限制条件下,与HC饮食相比,短期LC饮食降低了粪便重量,并对粪便短链脂肪酸的浓度和排泄产生了不利影响。这表明长期食用LC饮食可能会增加胃肠道疾病发生的风险。