Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A
Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 9, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Mar;38(3):134-40. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31066378.
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic, scano- and tomographic examination for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes.
TMJs in 80 dry human skulls were radiographed using digital panoramic examination, 4x sagittal (lateral) scanography, and sagittal cross-sectional tomography. All images were examined by three independent observers for the presence or absence of flattening, defects and osteophytes in the various joint components. The true presence of the morphological changes was unanimously decided by consensus of three independent observers using naked-eye inspection. The accuracy for detection of the specific changes in each joint component was expressed as sensitivity and specificity values, whereas the accuracy for detection of morphological changes in general in the condyle and in the TMJ in toto was expressed as the number of matching radiographic and "gold standard" scores.
Up to 23% and 9% of the three joint components were recorded as non-accessible to examination with panoramic examination and sagittal (lateral) scanography, respectively, whereas all components were accessible to examination with sagittal cross-sectional tomography. The difference was significant between panoramic examination and sagittal cross-sectional tomography (P = 0.018). No significant differences between the three methods for detection of specific morphological changes in the condyles and defects in the articular tubercles and changes in the TMJ in toto were found.
No differences in accuracies between the methods were found for the detection of morphological TMJ changes. However, with panoramic examination and sagittal (lateral) scanography markedly more joint components were non-accessible to examination than with sagittal cross-sectional tomography, with which all components were accessible.
比较全景、扫描及断层摄影检查在检测颞下颌关节(TMJ)形态变化方面的诊断准确性。
对80个干燥的人类颅骨的颞下颌关节进行数字全景检查、4倍矢状(侧位)扫描及矢状面断层摄影。所有图像由三名独立观察者检查,以确定各个关节组成部分是否存在扁平、缺损和骨赘。三名独立观察者通过肉眼检查达成共识,一致确定形态变化的真实存在情况。每个关节组成部分特定变化的检测准确性以敏感性和特异性值表示,而髁突及整个颞下颌关节形态变化的总体检测准确性以放射影像学与“金标准”评分的匹配数量表示。
全景检查和矢状(侧位)扫描分别记录到高达23%和9%的三个关节组成部分无法进行检查,而矢状面断层摄影可对所有组成部分进行检查。全景检查与矢状面断层摄影之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.018)。在检测髁突的特定形态变化、关节结节的缺损以及整个颞下颌关节的变化方面,三种方法之间未发现显著差异。
在检测颞下颌关节形态变化方面,各方法的准确性未发现差异。然而,与矢状面断层摄影相比,全景检查和矢状(侧位)扫描明显有更多的关节组成部分无法进行检查,矢状面断层摄影可对所有组成部分进行检查。