Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of panoramic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) radiography to detect bony lesions in patients with TMJ osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The value of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) projections of panoramic radiography for diagnosing TMJ osteoarthritis is not completely elucidated. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of panoramic TMJ radiography to detect bony lesions in patients with TMJ osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 55 TMJs of 44 subjects who were diagnosed with TMJ osteoarthritis. They underwent panoramic radiography (PanRad), lateral (LatTMJ) and frontal (FrnTMJ) projection panoramic TMJ radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). All images were examined by two observers for flattening, erosion, and osteophytes on the condylar head and articular eminence of the TMJ.

RESULTS

For detecting flattening lesions on the mandibular condyle, the sensitivities of PanRad, LatTMJ, and FrnTMJ were less than 67% and the combination of LatTMJ and FrnTMJ (ComTMJ) had the highest sensitivity for both observers (67.6% and 79.7%, respectively). For erosion lesions, the sensitivity of ComTMJ for observer 1 was the highest, at 84.3%, whereas the specificity of ComTMJ was the lowest, at 37.5%. The sensitivities of all four methods for observer 2 were less than 54% and the specificities ranged from 75.0% to 100%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was highest for ComTMJ (64.3%), followed by LatTMJ (59.5%). The intraobserver reliability was good for one observer and excellent for the other, and the interobserver reliability was fair or moderate.

CONCLUSION

Panoramic TMJ radiography demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy and acceptable reliability in detecting bony lesions of the TMJ, although it was better than conventional panoramic radiography.