• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[糖尿病教育项目中团体与个体策略的评估]

[Evaluation of group and individual strategies in a diabetes education program].

作者信息

Torres Heloisa de Carvalho, Franco Laercio Joel, Stradioto Mayra Alves, Hortale Virginia Alonso, Schall Virginia Torres

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermagem Aplicada, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Apr;43(2):291-8. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

PMID:19225700
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of individual and group strategies in a diabetes education program.

METHODS

A total of 104 type-2 diabetes outpatients enrolled in an education program of a teaching hospital in Belo Horizonte, Southeastern Brazil, were randomly selected and assigned to two different education strategies: group education (54 subjects) and individual education (50 subjects). Group education comprised three monthly sessions, which involved play and interactive dynamics. In parallel, a second group received individual education. Subjects were follow up for six months during 2006 and they were evaluated using specific questionnaires: knowledge of diabetes, psychological attitudes, change in behavior, quality of life. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, three and six months of intervention.

RESULTS

Mean age was 60.6 years. The results of group and individual education were similar in the assessment tests of attitude, change of behavior and quality of life. A reduction in HbA1c levels was seen in both groups, but a statistically significant difference (p=0.012) was found only in the group education.

CONCLUSIONS

Both strategies of diabetes education were effective, however, group education was more effective than individual education for blood glucose control.

摘要

目的

比较糖尿病教育项目中个体策略和小组策略的有效性。

方法

从巴西东南部贝洛奥里藏特一家教学医院的糖尿病教育项目中随机选取104名2型糖尿病门诊患者,并将其分为两种不同的教育策略组:小组教育(54名受试者)和个体教育(50名受试者)。小组教育包括每月三次课程,涉及游戏和互动活动。同时,另一组接受个体教育。在2006年期间对受试者进行了为期六个月的随访,并使用特定问卷对他们进行评估:糖尿病知识、心理态度、行为变化、生活质量。在干预的基线、三个月和六个月时进行临床评估。

结果

平均年龄为60.6岁。在态度、行为变化和生活质量的评估测试中,小组教育和个体教育的结果相似。两组的糖化血红蛋白水平均有所降低,但仅在小组教育中发现有统计学意义的差异(p = 0.012)。

结论

两种糖尿病教育策略均有效,然而,在血糖控制方面,小组教育比个体教育更有效。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of group and individual strategies in a diabetes education program].[糖尿病教育项目中团体与个体策略的评估]
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Apr;43(2):291-8. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
2
Development and evaluation of a patient-oriented education system for diabetes management.糖尿病管理患者导向教育系统的开发与评估
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Sep;76(9):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.030. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
3
Closing the gap between literature and practice: evaluation of a teaching programme (in the absence of a structured treatment) on both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.弥合文献与实践之间的差距:对一项针对1型和2型糖尿病(在缺乏结构化治疗的情况下)的教学计划的评估。
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2003 Oct-Dec;16(5-6):298-305.
4
Evaluation of a food label nutrition intervention for women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.对2型糖尿病女性进行食品标签营养干预的评估。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Mar;99(3):323-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00082-6.
5
Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND): process modelling of pilot study.糖尿病持续及新诊断患者的教育与自我管理(DESMOND):试点研究的过程建模
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
6
[Pilot study of two different strategies to reinforce self care behaviors and treatment compliance among type 2 diabetes patients from low income strata].[针对低收入阶层2型糖尿病患者强化自我护理行为和治疗依从性的两种不同策略的初步研究]
Gac Med Mex. 2009 Jan-Feb;145(1):15-9.
7
Short-term effects of an educational program on health-seeking behavior for infections in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled intervention trial in primary care.一项教育项目对2型糖尿病患者感染就医行为的短期影响:一项初级保健中的随机对照干预试验
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):402-7. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0744. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
8
Enhancing regular physical activity and relapse prevention through a 1-day therapeutic patient education workshop: A pilot study.通过为期一天的治疗性患者教育工作坊增强规律体育活动和预防复发:一项试点研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
9
A randomized controlled trial to improve the quality of life of type 2 diabetic patients using a self-help group program.一项使用自助小组计划改善2型糖尿病患者生活质量的随机对照试验。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009 Jan;40(1):169-76.
10
Evaluation of the "Know Your Health" program for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in a large employer group.对大型雇主群体中2型糖尿病和高血压的“了解你的健康”项目的评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Dec;12 Spec no.:SP33-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of health literacy interventions on glycemic control and self-management outcomes among type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.健康素养干预对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和自我管理结局的影响:系统评价。
J Diabetes. 2023 Sep;15(9):724-735. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13436. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Qualitative assessment of family caregiver-centered neonatal education program in Karnataka, India.印度卡纳塔克邦以家庭照顾者为中心的新生儿教育项目的定性评估
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;3(2):e0000524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000524. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of Pain Neuroscience Education Program in Community Physiotherapy Context on Pain Perception and Psychosocial Variables Associated with It in Elderly Persons: A Ranzomized Controlled Trial.
社区物理治疗背景下疼痛神经科学教育方案对老年人疼痛感知及相关心理社会变量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911855.
4
Evaluation of the effects of a diabetes educational program: a randomized clinical trial.一项糖尿病教育项目效果的评估:一项随机临床试验。
Rev Saude Publica. 2018 Feb 5;52:8. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052007132.
5
Comparison of education group strategies and home visits in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trial.2型糖尿病教育组策略与家访的比较:临床试验
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Dec 21;25:e2979. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2315.2979.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of an empowerment program for self-care in type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomized trial.评估一项2型糖尿病自我护理赋权计划的有效性:一项整群随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3937-5.
7
Evaluation of the telephone intervention in the promotion of diabetes self-care: a randomized clinical trial.电话干预对促进糖尿病自我管理的效果评估:一项随机临床试验。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Aug 29;24:e2719. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0632.2719.
8
Modelling of diabetes knowledge, attitudes, self-management, and quality of life: a cross-sectional study with an Australian sample.糖尿病知识、态度、自我管理及生活质量的模型构建:一项针对澳大利亚样本的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 19;13:129. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0303-8.
9
Effectiveness of individual and group interventions for people with type 2 diabetes.针对2型糖尿病患者的个体干预和团体干预的有效性
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Feb-Apr;23(2):200-7. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0247.2543.
10
Self-efficacy in foot-care and effect of training: a single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.足部护理自我效能及培训效果:一项单盲随机对照临床试验。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2015 Apr;3(2):141-9.