Turvey Michael T, Fonseca Sergio
Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:93-123. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_6.
Four perspectives on motor control provide the framework for developing a comprehensive theory of motor control in biological systems. The four perspectives, of decreasing orthodoxy, are distinguished by their sources of inspiration: neuroanatomy, robotics, self-organization, and ecological realities. Twelve major issues that commonly constrain (either explicitly or implicitly) the understanding of the control and coordination of movement are identified and evaluated within the framework of the four perspectives. The issues are as follows: (1) Is control strictly neural? (2) Is there a divide between planning and execution? (3) Does control entail a frequently involved knowledgeable executive? (4) Do analytical internal models mediate control? (5) Is anticipation necessarily model dependent? (6) Are movements preassembled? (7) Are the participating components context independent? (8) Is force transmission strictly myotendinous? (9) Is afference a matter of local linear signaling? (10) Is neural noise an impediment? (11) Do standard variables (of mechanics and physiology) suffice? (12) Is the organization of control hierarchical?
关于运动控制的四种观点为构建生物系统中运动控制的综合理论提供了框架。这四种观点,正统性依次降低,其灵感来源各有不同:神经解剖学、机器人技术、自组织以及生态现实。在这四种观点的框架内,识别并评估了十二个通常(或明确或隐含地)限制对运动控制与协调理解的主要问题。这些问题如下:(1)控制是否严格由神经主导?(2)计划与执行之间是否存在划分?(3)控制是否需要一个频繁参与的知识渊博的执行者?(4)分析性内部模型是否介导控制?(5)预期是否必然依赖模型?(6)动作是否预先组装好?(7)参与的组件是否与上下文无关?(8)力的传递是否严格通过肌腱?(9)传入是否是局部线性信号的问题?(10)神经噪声是否是一种阻碍?(11)(力学和生理学的)标准变量是否足够?(12)控制的组织是否是分层的?